Associate
- Joined
- 22 Jun 2015
- Posts
- 137
No, not a good 20-40% faster. At best, 10-35%, and I already have a card that does that: a non-reference GTX 980 Ti.I think you're really cherry picking your comparison there. Your overclocked card vs a stock 1080 on an irrelevant benchmark. In games the 1080 is a good 20-40% faster, has more memory and uses far less power. Personally it's too expensive for me but it soundly trumps the 980Ti.
http://www.computerbase.de/2016-05/geforce-gtx-1080-test/7/#diagramm-performancerating-2560-1440
http://www.computerbase.de/2016-05/...tt_geforce_gtx_980_ti_mit_15_ghz_gegen_pascal
As you can see, it takes an overclocked 1080 to beat an overclocked 980 Ti G1, and even then it's only a 14% increase, which hardly qualifies as "soundly trumps".
There is a clear parallel here: just like the 980 was a poor upgrade for the 780 Ti, the 1080 is not a significant upgrade for the 980 Ti.
Last edited: