Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I'm using 1 and 3, pretty sure that's what the manual said.
Another user video for you Kaap.
The Unreal Kite demo, Ran at 1080P using the target line command.
CPU: 4790K @ 4.80GHZ
GPU: Titan X @ 1400/8000
Driver: 353.12
X99A XPower and you're right, just had a look.
****.
I seem to remember 8pack saying that Asic has little or no effect on these cards as far as clocking goes, but I could be wrong. Mine is 77.7 and clocks well.YMMV.
I wouldnt worry too much, there's next to nothing in it from x16x8 to x16x16
i have been watching and reading some reviews . i wonder why some reviews at 4k, the stock 980ti are exactly the same fps as stock Titan. or some are even 1-2fps faster . ( most of review Titan X are still faster 1-2 fps )
what am i missing here ? because i want to upgrade to Titan X now from 980ti ( waiting to be in stock ) but if it won't be a little faster then it is no point to upgrade.
i have been watching and reading some reviews . i wonder why some reviews at 4k, the stock 980ti are exactly the same fps as stock Titan. or some are even 1-2fps faster . ( most of review Titan X are still faster 1-2 fps )
what am i missing here ? because i want to upgrade to Titan X now from 980ti ( waiting to be in stock ) but if it won't be a little faster then it is no point to upgrade.
l o l
I doubt they are running on the same boost (luck of draw). Clock vs clock the TX is faster.
Mine are rocking 1424/2000 on air (stock bios) the equivalent overclocking on a GTX980Ti will be slower.
Edit: It won't be noticeable though moving from a GTX980Ti to a TX unless you are using settings that go over 6GB VRAM.