I'm riding the current DiRT series with a different Team than my usual 3R - blasphemy!
But just not enough there interested to field a team. I'm riding with TBR 'Dirty Pugs'.
Did an ok first race, then a brutal one on
Tuesday up the Epic KOM & Radio tower. Was very late joining (still eating my dinner!) and no warm up. Worked to stick in, then join the front groups after the first climb had split it, before easing to find a lightweight friend who'd got dropped and
tow her back up the bridge along the base of the Epic to get her back into contention. It worked well and she flew up the road. Figured my race was done so mostly pacing the first part of the Epic at a hard tempo, eased to middle (was going to stop!) but at that point had come to the realisation that I had amazing legs so pressed on! Pretty much my highest or on par for the best power of 2022 for 6min - 51min, including my fastest time up there in 2 years and a PR on the Radio Tower so pretty pleased.
TLDR; 19th & 29th in a busy 'low B' series racing as a top C. Just need the results to push me back up into B!
Sort of but not as you say. I have the V4 version and whilst the watts are relatively consistent the cadence is what goes a bit crazy. On those Zwift efforts where it asks you to hold a set RPM the cadence sometimes goes wild. One moment it can say I'm doing 70 then all of a sudden it'll sky rocket and say I'm doing 120+ and sometimes the opposite is true despite my legs not changing speed.
My V5 (2020) does the same but maybe not as regularly as you say. Just 'sometimes' I'll see it spike to ~120rpm and then ease back down again. The few times I've done any sessions with required RPM intervals it hasn't done it, so maybe in ERG mode it doesn't? So might be something related to it 'averaging' out cadence? The rider doesn't change, the cadence sensor is detecting the number of revolutions, but then the number of X within Y period is too low so it 'spikes' to even out...?
Tweeks and PBK (plus maybe others) have the Saris H3 for £475 at the moment. Quite a saving over a Kickr V5 at £830+
DC Rainmaker puts it in the same category at the Kickr and Flux. I'm coming up to a year of H3 ownership and it's been faultless. A look on VeloViewer says I've done 78 hours over 102 sessions on it so far this year.
For nearly a decade my trainer recommendations guide has been a staple of this time of year, consolidating all the latest trainers into the do and don’t buy list to consider before spending some hard-earned cash to then suffer inside.
www.dcrainmaker.com
Great purchase and unit, the H2 (& H3) meant to be some of the best ERG units, so great for training plans/intervals on any platform and easily the better units for Trainerroad.
Worth noting the KICKR V5 is not £830. Got mine easily earlier in the year (when inventory problems where still rife) for £699 waiting for deals (price was £799 on Zwifts site, but 749 elsewhere, then they did a weekend sale with 100 off). Also the KICKR v5 comes with 2 year warranty. Saris only has 1 and they're notoriously bad at warranty/support/service outside of the States. YMMV!
I find some of the zwift races can get quite frustrating like this. People sit behind while groups are catching refusing to even do usual power (2.5-3.0 W/kg) and even stop to not take the lead.
I also suspect a lot of C riders are B riders who regulate their efforts to stay within limits. Many races I find the lead pack sitting at 2.3-2.5 W/kg, no one will try to break away or lead out. Then when you hit the final 2km, 2-3 riders will just run at 7W/kg to the end up hill. When you check their stats they flick between the two categories.
Race more popular series and you'll find more serious racers are generally more 'honest' and not sandbagging as much. More popular = more admins, more enforcement, etc etc. ZRL, TFC, DiRT to name a few. but much of the front of the races (regardless of CAT) are similar on the popular courses. Zwift is not made for breakaways so they very rarely work, it's also more biased towards maximum wattages and peak power. Draft being so strong also boosts both of these, not to mention most of the popular and common races not finishing at a KOM or long climb. It has just become natural to wheelsuck and get to the final KM's as fresh as possible - as that's where the race/results are mostly decided from a massive group!
It's getting to the season again!
Quick question for some of you. I have the Kickr V4. Works perfectly fine for my needs so no need to upgrade to the V5. I recently got the assioma-duo power meter pedals. What is better to use for power when using Zwift, the turbo trainer or the pedals? I would've thought the pedals would've been more accurate and the sensible option? Just keen to see what some of you have used? I know I'd like to use the pedals for cadence at least as the Kickr does a terrible job of estimating cadence and jumps all over the place.
They're measuring different things, but both should be pretty accurate when warmed up and calibrated. Do some dual recordings to see the differences between them - but also understand there will be, but then also consider the KICKR really recording 'at the drive' whereas the pedals recording at the 'source' (what I mean by different things). Your sprints/kicks will be higher peaks with the pedals, but your sustained power and changes in response and 'feel' will be quicker from the KICKR as source. You can easily just have the pedals as a cadence source (providing not Apple/iOS/TVOS as that's limited connections), or even run a standalone cheapy cadence sensor to avoid swapping pedals around all the time.
I'd guess that anyone "managing" their category and trying to avoid being upgraded is more motivated by getting a good race result than getting better / fitter. Given that most of us race with randoms that could well be cheating in some way, it seems a bit daft getting too bothered by race results, and I prefer to look at my own metrics and try to nudge the power curve up and maybe even try to develop a half-decent sprint sometime.
I don't do that many races but I'll keep doing a few of the chase races - they look like they should be good fun when a group works together as intended.
Exactly it - can only really 'worry' about yourself and know for sure that at least 1 person is racing with the same ethics, with a setup they trust, but it is only really yourself you can be sure about.
I don’t think it really matters as the two types of effort are different and you can’t compare inside to outside so if one was 10w different to the other it wouldn’t be a big deal.
It does mean if you were super serious you could dual record however, and does allow you to benchmark one bike power meter to another (not that it’s an issue with pedals) but in my case 3 bikes 3 different crank power meters but I can use the turbo as the constant.
Exactly this.
Zwift race results and statistics.
zwiftpower.com
Zwiftpower is a great place to do this - doesn't have to be a race, can even upload multiple .fit files so I think you could technically use it to compare without even a Zwift ride in there... But strange that you wouldn't! Most of the other comparison tools are limited by paywalls. DCR has a good tool that is quite cheap but was an annual/monthly sub so really only worth using if you wanted far more control/data all the time. Golden Cheetah is free, but very complicated and I found it quick clunky. There's probably others out there but I found ZP quick & easy & free.
My naming wasn't great and isn't accurate, but for testing the Neo when it played up, then the PWM's to it, then the Flux which was faulty against them, to then use the KICKR vs the Stages - mostly what I would call 'accurate', even with results like the above and this:
https://zwiftpower.com/analysis.php?set_id=210902
You may get better than that, you may get worse!
I've got far worse on my Profile - look under Analysis at the top. Been a while since I did any dual recording actually...!