I'm still waiting for you to make a valid point. I won't hold my breath.I guess I'll wait for your counter point then. I won't hold my breath.
I'm still waiting for you to make a valid point. I won't hold my breath.I guess I'll wait for your counter point then. I won't hold my breath.
Nah, they were all straight and white. Wonder where that mythical diversity went..I think some were same-sex cannibals, if that perks your interest a bit more ?
My point was you complained about Joel being a whiny **** in the show then in the most recent ep;I'm still waiting for you to make a valid point. I won't hold my breath.
cheers for that. take it i'm not allowed to post a reply or further thoughts on it now seeing as i missed the original discussion?Page 20, post 393
to be fair, i wasn't even really looking to discuss the episode as i know i'm late to the party. figured by posting my 'the **** was that all about' thoughts someone might have given me a quick 'because...reasons' reply........ instead i got vincenthanna's 'sod off and read the thread' post.In your shoes, i'd find out what date episode 4 was shown, then drop back to page 1, get a cuppa and have a leisurely read through ensuring I don't go past that date - i've done it before when getting into a show late that had an active thread, not sure if I had the cuppa though
Yes and your point is utter nonsense. Glad we could have this talk.My point was you complained about Joel being a whiny **** in the show then in the most recent ep;
That's it. End of point.he rather graphically tortured a guy, killed him, then killed another guy in cold blood
Same here, game virgin - there were some careless posts but think they got tidied up, nothing major was given away and i've been reading week by week.i actually had started to read the earlier pages of the thread to try and get to ep3 but stopped as there seemed to be a lot of spoiler tags starting to appear and i was concerned about fans of the game inadvertently giving summat away (i've not played the game so am a TLOU virgin)
ah ok, cheers for that (genuinely) - shame others can't be so helpful. thought i'd stumbled into a GD thread by mistake when i read the reply my first post gotSame here, game virgin - there were some careless posts but think they got tidied up, nothing major was given away and i've been reading week by week.
watched episode 3 last night. the **** was that all about and to what purpose?!
So offensive and unhelpful, I truly am ashamed and sorry...Why not go back through the thread to when everyone was discussing episode 3?
got to post 419 - now i get your pithy reply to my post. my apologies if you think my 'wtf was that episode' was in any way related to the homosexual side of things. i'd have been 'wtfing' had it be a heterosexual couple. my wtf comes from the fact it was more or less a full episode about 2 side characters who up till that point have only had a brief mention or 2 a best and then they killed them off at the end. i was expecting more from Bill, Frank, Joel and Ellie.....not a pointless love story. why give a full episode to 2 characters that are immediately being killed off. seemed strange to me. but anyways - i'll back out of the thread now till i've caught up so there's no more confusion.Page 20, post 393
you don't need to be a dick about it.So offensive and unhelpful, I truly am ashamed and sorry...
I don't believe any reasonable person thought your initial episode response was due to the gay relationship, having filler pop up in ep 3 and wondering why it's there is a perfectly valid opiniongot to post 419 - now i get your pithy reply to my post. my apologies if you think my 'wtf was that episode' was in any way related to the homosexual side of things. i'd have been 'wtfing' had it be a heterosexual couple. my wtf comes from the fact it was more or less a full episode about 2 side characters who up till that point have only had a brief mention or 2 a best and then they killed them off at the end. i was expecting more from Bill, Frank, Joel and Ellie.....not a pointless love story. why give a full episode to 2 characters that are immediately being killed off. seemed strange to me. but anyways - i'll back out of the thread now till i've caught up so there's no more confusion.
my bad if anyone else also thought i was limping in late to try and start some sort of 'eww gays' argument. i really wasn't!
that's why i was wtf?! episode 3 and we're getting a back story on 2 characters we've only heard mention once, and now that's the end of them. seems an odd decision. i'd get that sort of episode if Bill and Frank had been major characters. i'd have been very interested in their back story etc. but ultimately they were (or appear to be) 2 throwaway characters. you don't make filler or back story episodes on throwaway characters imo. as the missus said to me after watching it, that was an ok episode and quite sad but what was the point of Bill and Frank?having filler pop up in ep 3 and wondering why it's there is a perfectly valid opinion
If you want it in a nutshell, it was to remind Joel that he too is a protector and needs to look after Tessthat's why i was wtf?! episode 3 and we're getting a back story on 2 characters we've only heard mention once, and now that's the end of them. seems an odd decision. i'd get that sort of episode if Bill and Frank had been major characters. i'd have been very interested in their back story etc. but ultimately they were (or appear to be) 2 throwaway characters. you don't make filler or back story episodes on throwaway characters imo. as the missus said to me after watching it, that was an ok episode and quite sad but what was the point of Bill and Frank?
long winded way to go about it if you ask me. and also an insane waste of what appeared to be 2 very good characters. i'd liked to have known a lot more about their survival history, interactions with raiders/traders/infected etc. instead, as soon as i got invested in their story the writers take the easy way out and kill them offIf you want it in a nutshell, it was to remind Joel that he too is a protector and needs to look after Tess
But Tess was already dead by the time he read the letter, so it was re-enforcing his promise to Tess to protect Ellie.
Ahh, the cannibals, this episode is apparently decent.. But I've lost interest in this show at this stage, not much incentive to watch when you know game probably did it better anyway.
Also, the cult nutjobs are half dead from starvation. Still, even my other half who isn't one to nitpick remarked 'he got better quick didn't he?'.Tbf he...
Surprised the first guy with a knife straight to the neck, we don't see how he overpowered the 2nd but can only assume got the drop on him also - 3rd was due to a distraction from the 2nd
Your 2nd point however, was wondering where they all were too - can only assume they'd been told to go elsewhere while he dealt with Ellie - can't have your easily led religious freaks seeing you doing anything too nasty.
The leader of the group says it's a 4 mile trip earlier in the episode when first encountering EllieMy personal nitpick with the most recent episode was having no sense of where anyone was supposed to be in relation to each other. Is everything being shot on one street near some woods? Are these towns apart? I guess so from the map scene but I just couldn’t gauge how far away people were - so I ended up smashing my TV with a hammer in frustration. The game didn’t break my TV, just wtf is this BS!!