The RGB full range toggle is new in these drivers, yes. You've been able to toggle it with a small third party program for years. It's amazing that it's taken Nvidia so long to implement such a simple feature really.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**THE NVIDIA DRIVERS THREAD**
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 May 2006
- Posts
- 5,769
What does it do? Isn't it set to full by default?
Took them long enough to add RGB toggle, but just glad the option is there within the driver now.
Soldato
mine is set to full by default.
just noticed the render test in GPUZ 0.8.0 is okay now no more blockiness.
just noticed the render test in GPUZ 0.8.0 is okay now no more blockiness.
Surely you're connected by HDMI. Limited via DVI/DP (a dedicated monitor) is going to look messy.
After so many years with AMD I made the switch to the green team with my 2 970 reference cards and I have to say the noise and temperature of these things is nothing but pure magic!
Both cards at stock voltage and I've only upped the core clock and memory clock to +100 and not really sure how much further I can go but they're at 24c and 21c idle while at load not breaking 56c running Heaven bench mark.
One thing I have noticed though is the image and colour don't seem as sharp or as vibrant as my 290. Have I missed something in the control panel?
Forgot to add I'm connected via dual dvi I believe.
Both cards at stock voltage and I've only upped the core clock and memory clock to +100 and not really sure how much further I can go but they're at 24c and 21c idle while at load not breaking 56c running Heaven bench mark.
One thing I have noticed though is the image and colour don't seem as sharp or as vibrant as my 290. Have I missed something in the control panel?
Forgot to add I'm connected via dual dvi I believe.
Caporegime
Ive heard a lot of users report the same that image is a bit less vibrant on nv cards compared to amd's. You could try messing around with digital vibrance in the nv control panel.
same here, open nvidia control panel and change rgb from limited to ful rgb, both amd and nvidia will look the same
Soldato
Why is full RGB not set as default in Nvidia control panel?
dont know, thought it was a bit stupid myself
Thanks OG just enabled that, one last question and I half promise I'll stop bugging you. I noticed in some games my monitor resolution shows as 2560*1440 59hz but used to show 60hz. Is this another option I've missed?
A specific example is Endless Legend.
A specific example is Endless Legend.
Soldato
My monitor also does the same thing 59hz. Only started doing this when I've been using Nvidia cards. I swear my 5870 was showing 60hz with the same monitor.
Soldato
Why would the default rgb setting be limited tho? Seems strange. Are colours better when set to full?
Does it matter that I'm using DVI?
This Nvidia forum post seems to suggest it's for HDMI users only.
Does it matter that I'm using DVI?
This Nvidia forum post seems to suggest it's for HDMI users only.
Last edited:
Limited (Video RGB) = when your display works with pixel values 16-235. 16 is jet black, 235 is absolute white.
Full (sRGB) = When your display works with pixel values 0-255.
I'd like to think that the driver establishes that the computer is connected to a TV (HDMI) then auto-configures to Limited.
If you set your driver to Full although using a 16-235 display you'll see jet black pixels where the driver intended for dark greys (1-16) and absolute white pixels although the intention was bright greys (235-254). You'll see colours that are brighter and also darker than intended.
It might look like the contrast is enhanced but you'll actually be losing colour detail: a dark, folded cloth with creases and self-shadowing will just look plain black.
Using Limited on a 0-255 display, on the other hand, will reduce contrast dramatically.
TL;DR
The correct mode is the one that shows the most squares
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/white.php
Full (sRGB) = When your display works with pixel values 0-255.
I'd like to think that the driver establishes that the computer is connected to a TV (HDMI) then auto-configures to Limited.
If you set your driver to Full although using a 16-235 display you'll see jet black pixels where the driver intended for dark greys (1-16) and absolute white pixels although the intention was bright greys (235-254). You'll see colours that are brighter and also darker than intended.
It might look like the contrast is enhanced but you'll actually be losing colour detail: a dark, folded cloth with creases and self-shadowing will just look plain black.
TL;DR
The correct mode is the one that shows the most squares
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/black.php
http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/white.php
Soldato
Any one played around with the MFAA settings?
From what I understand it is similar to using MSAA but at a lower cost.
With MFAA set in control panel, when you set MSAAx2 you get the same IQ as MSAAx4 but only at the cost of using MSAAx2 etc....
What happens if game max is MSAAx8 and you set it to that?
From what I understand it is similar to using MSAA but at a lower cost.
With MFAA set in control panel, when you set MSAAx2 you get the same IQ as MSAAx4 but only at the cost of using MSAAx2 etc....
What happens if game max is MSAAx8 and you set it to that?
Geforce 347.12 Cuda 7.0 Dev drivers
https://www.mediafire.com/?o1uv231imgmqgru
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=396199
https://www.mediafire.com/?o1uv231imgmqgru
http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?t=396199