• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***The Official ATI Radeon HD 5850 / 5870 Reviews and Discussion Thread***

tis a shame that $379 into pounds with 15% vat is only £270, looks to me like some "we have the first cards, pay us 10% more for the privilage" pricing going on :(


As for scores, its hard to show full performance ever frankly, game optimisation and a year or more of driver improvements change a cards performance drastically.

At this stage i'd expect a pretty hefty wedge of performance still to come from teh 5XXX series and pretty much no performance improvements anymore from 4XXX or Nvidia cards.

But then you've got, new games, in dx10.1/dx11 where the gap will widen and as performance in newer games pushes cards, the 5XXX should have power to burn, even more so with driver improvements, while the Nvidia cards should start to be pushed.

We've always had diminishing returns and lets be honest, theres few games now a 4870 can't handle well, let alone a 4890/gtx 285 or any dual gpu card.

If you're buying a £300(£270 :rolleyes: ) for old games that already play more than well enough on cards half the price just for the sake of pushing your FPS up while not improving your gaming experience in the slightest, well, its not a smart thing to do.

I buy newer cards so when better games come out I don't play them, decide performance sucked and have a worse experience than I should have.

Which is why, due to early pricing and nothing new out just yet I'll most likely wait till before a couple big and demanding games are out.


The biggest issue is price, not least from gouging but from a crappy low yield process. something like 100 of these cores can fit on a $5k waifer from TSMC on 40nm, call that $50 a core as they come out, make some profit and they are selling them for $80-90 a core, and its easy to make a $250 dollar card. Now cut yields to 50% (or less) and you're suddenly looking at the cost doubling to $100 per core as they come out, they have to sell it for more to break even, than a better yield can be sold for a profit :(

Which is why Nvidia are going to be in a horrific position with their huge cores.

These might not beat Nvidia cards by enough for the price shown, but ouch, Nvidia cards are unlikely to come close to doubling performance while they are going to cost significantly more to break even, or be sold at a loss.

This might be the first generation I wait till the 5870x2 and possible 5890 is out, to push prices down, hope for better yields and for harder games to be out.
 
Last edited:
I've emailed Ace Modder about the PowerColor HD5850's unless anyone wants to ring up and ask about them.
 
Excellent point: clicky

Cheers Azza, I'll have a shufty at that now :)

Holty crap, just seen that and screw the 5870, the 5850 is [and I'm generalising here - check out the TechPowerUp review for details] 90% of the card for 66% of the money, and appears to have the 285, the previous fastest single GPU solution, trumped on most sides, with Crysis being the main exeption, but then nothing likes the Crytek2 engine that much anyway unless it has a multi-GPU setup.

That's really rather impressive, and aught to give nVidia one hell of a fright...
 
tis a shame that $379 into pounds with 15% vat is only £370, looks to me like some "we have the first cards, pay us 10% more for the privilage" pricing going on :(.

:confused: OC is selling them for £298 [only a smallish gouge!:D].

As its a business etc etc etc but its not £370!
 
I need to ring up and ask what one has the better features LOL and warantee support as the XFX seems to have exclusive OCUK warantee support.

also enquire about DIRT II
 
:confused: OC is selling them for £298 [only a smallish gouge!:D].

As its a business etc etc etc but its not £370!



I think he meant £270 inc VAt extrapoloated from the US price in dollars, which is a bit closer to reality ;)

I'm still hugely impressed with the 'mid level' high end card giving the 285 a heart attack - roll on 5890/5870x2..
 
I need to ring up and ask what one has the better features LOL and warantee support as the XFX seems to have exclusive OCUK warantee support.

also enquire about DIRT II


Ask about the PowerColor HD5850s while you are at it.


I'm having to get into the shower to resist ordering. :D
 
tbh its very strange that techpower is the only site to get a hold of a 5850 and in the review there is no mention of 5850 power consumption, noise or overclocking potential.
 
:confused: OC is selling them for £298 [only a smallish gouge!:D].

As its a business etc etc etc but its not £370!

Indeed, in the pre release thread I did the simple maths, the $399/350EUR price available abroad equated to £280/£303, so the price OCUK are charging is right on the mark.
 
Last edited:
tis a shame that $379 into pounds with 15% vat is only £270, looks to me like some "we have the first cards, pay us 10% more for the privilage" pricing going on :(

What are you on about? While OCUK are normally very bad when it comes to release pricing (and poorer with customer service), i cant moan at these prices.

And as anyone should know, even the most stupid of people, stuff in the U.K is always dearer than that in the U.S. No one could honestly just covert U.S dollars into pounds and then expect it to cost that much here.
 
Argh... the 5850 makes more sense rationally... £100 off, but still >90% as good as the 5870... but the 5870 is the best out at the moment... argh! My girlfriend's going to kill me if I buy either... so should I buy both?
 
I'm actually far more impressed with the 5850 benchmarks. Looks like a lovely card for £100 less than the 5870.

Suddenly I'm not so sure which one to get.

Anybody else?
 
"IF" the 5850 really offers 90% of the performance, you could guess that the 5870 is a little limited somewhere, as with lower clockspeed and less shaders it shouldn't be within 10%. Now the question is, is it a bandwidth limitation, driver limitation or like I said earlier, just only so much performance you can grab out of these games/cpu's systems.


Bit-Tech have some interesting numbers, their minimum fps numbers show the card is FAR stronger than the 4870(x2) in lots of situations, even with the max/average isn't that much higher the min fps is often hugely higher(double that of the 4890 and 285GTX in several situations) which is more important to me than the max numbers.

But this is the thing for me, ATi have always had less rops and less raw horsepower to get the stupid silly performance in benchmarks, those parts of a benchmark loop looking at a brick wall where the fps goes up to 250. ATi has always had the low end grunt but not the massive high end horsepower, but its the low end grunt where you WANT all the performance.

I still think its a superb card, and the 5850 needs to be reviewed somewhere like bit-tech to see if its min fps is noticably lower than the 5870, rather than just the average/max fps.

Its just not really worth £300, its not really worth £270 tbh, and if TSMC didn't suck and they were getting not far off double the yields we'd see a much much lower price :(

As I've been saying for months the BIGGEST improvement in the industry to come in the next few years isn't Intel coming in to the game, nor Nvidia or ATi doing anything drastic, but TSMC having real competition from Global Foundries so they can't afford to screw up.

Fact is the 40nm doesn't mean anything to TSMC< they get 5k per waifer no matter if the yields or 20% or 80%, you pay for the silicon and time not the yields and its your choice to use the process or not. Once GLobal Foundries is up and running and taking orders, they will for certain lose AMD business, and will have to invest heavily to keep competitive to keep Nvidia's business.

Keep in mind both companies should have had 40nm refreshes out LAST DECEMBER with normal yields, we're a year late with turd yields. TSMC screwed up 55nm for Nvidia, screwed up 65nm for the 2900XT and almost everything in the past 5 years from them has been overpriced and late. Competition in production, finally, means lower prices for everyone, better processes, faster clock speeds, no delays in generations, no increased costs due to low yields and better performance for all.
 
Back
Top Bottom