@Kona
Personally I don't

Samsung would still sell more due to things like them being a brand, which you know/recognise straight away etc. but if they both had the same level of marketing/advertising (and htc didn't release loads of devices, only the one), there would definitely not be as huge of a difference in sales as there currently is.
Again, if marketing wasn't the key to their huge success then why would they continue to up their marketing budget each time? If it wasn't they are just wasting money for the sake of it.
Last years HTC phones were very good competitors to the GS 3 and personally I would still take a HOS/XL (and one X now that its main issues are sorted with JB/sense V4+ and new batches) over a GS 3 any day of the week (many people have moved from the GS 3 to the one S etc. for the same reasons I prefer them to the GS 3).
Again I point to the razr HD/MAXX, they are a more complete/better phone than the GS 3 overall aside from the camera mainly yet in the USA, GS 3 has still sold way more. And motorola aren't exactly a brand, which not many people aren't sure about compared to HTC.
The thing is though, their other products aren't really that high end/good, only now are they starting to catch up with the TV tech. but compared to panny etc. they still have a long way to go. Everything else of theirs has always been pretty crap imo i.e. laptops (no idea what they are like these days for that though) etc. the only thing outside of phones that I would consider of theirs are hard drives/SSD's. Maybe they are just concentrating on one market at a time

as their phones were never that great either until the GS 2.
True they do make stupid mistakes but that is one of my points, how many average joes (the majority of customers) will know about those things i.e. tegra 3, how many will care about having as much storage as possible (a lot of people still use MP3 players/ipods as dedicated music players), RGB NLED (GS 2/GS 1 didn't even have a NLED yet it was still popular, where as the sensation and desire had a great RGB NLED + SD slot, removable battery etc.), removable battery etc.? Not very many. It is only us on these sites that seem to care about "everything" and even then there are people that aren't bothered about minor things like the NLED, removable battery etc. i.e. in my case, SD slot, removable battery means nothing and imo those are the only real advantages of the samsung phones generally.
As I keep saying, I think the galaxy phones are great, there is no denying that, however, imo they are over hyped, over rated and aren't "that much" better than the competition, with the GS 2, no questions, outstanding but with the GS 3 VS the comp. no way imo.
I think the one will do better than last year as well, not so much due to it being a great phone overall but due to HTC marketing/advertising it better, only having the one phone.
edit:
Perfect example, my friends husband got her the GS 3 for the reason "was the most popular device and was always seeing things about it on TV", I was showing her new phones (needs a new one as she broke her GS 3) and telling her about the specs etc. she didn't have a clue and when showing her the nexus 4, she was more impressed with it than the GS 3, however, still wants another GS 3 or is waiting for the GS 4 now and she is not a power user at all....
Guess will just have to agree to disagree on this though!
