@Robbo
Ah ok
I wasn't 100% sure but thought I remembered you saying something about it being delayed in Norway, perhaps it was just with regards to the pebble blue version then as that was delayed everywhere by a good few weeks iirc?
Yup because 100% totally proven beyond a doubt that marketing is the only reason Samsung out sell HTC, nothing to do with specs, quality, earned brand loyalty or fulfilled customers glad that potentially half a years disposable income wasn't wasted on a tech turkey telling their mates.
Obviously specs etc. are good and I have said the galaxy phones are great, but they aren't that much "better", if any better than the other phones (depending on what is important) especially when it comes to "average joes"
- CPU/GPU, the snapdragon CPU is superb, average joes aren't going to know anything about tegra 3 except "quad"
- screen, personal preference, many sights still rate the X screen as the best
- battery GS 3 is much better than the X but not the XL/S
- software, personal preference
etc.
Explain to me where the exynos CPU etc. is very noticeable that allows Samsung to sell many more units? Does it loads web pages/apps etc. 10 seconds faster, does the camera take far better photos in every condition, is the audio crystal clear compared to the one phones etc.
Plenty of satisfied customers with HTC, sony etc. phones. I could go through the GS 3, note II thread and pick out a ton of users who haven't been happy with their GS 3 etc. not to mention all the users who experienced the sudden death issue.....
Again if marketing etc. wasn't so important then why would Samsung be making such a big deal about it and putting so much money into it and plan to do the exact same again for the GS 4 etc.?
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Mark...-is-the-mind-boggling-amount-it-spent_id40543
“Samsung’s focus on marketing was the main reason the company was so successful last year,” an anonymous source inside Samsung said.
“With its strategic Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note smartphones selling tens of millions, the company doesn’t care too much about allocating a gigantic marketing budget," the Samsung source added.
If it wasn't the reason for being so successful then they could save themselves a **** load of money.
I know you are a big fan of Samsung devices but you can't deny that the "main" reason they sell a ton of devices is due to their marketing/advertising and not just how many ads etc. there are but the way they "execute" the ads compared to HTC.
Lets put it this way, if Samsung's marketing/ads were much the same as HTC, do you still think they would be selling as many units as what they are currently?
Also lets hear why you think the RAZR HD/MAXX didn't do well? As the only disadvantage of it compared to the GS 3 is the camera.
There is nothing wrong with the way Samsung market their devices, HTC etc. need to learn from them and it is their fault that they are doing so bad, but to make it out like that isn't the reason why they are largely so successful is mind boggling.
I agree with their success with the GS 2 (much deserved!) as that was miles ahead of every phone, but not with the GS 3.