Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That is because there were cards above the 970 in those price points. When the lets presume GTX 1080 comes out it will be the highest card in the range.
Did the GTX 680 launch at £300 despite being around 20% faster than the 580?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/7
no it didn't, same price, 20% faster. The 970 isn't remotely comparable because at no time was it close to the fastest card available, not even the fastest card from Nvidia.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_970_Gaming/14.html
at 1080p it was slower than 4 available Nvidia cards(one a duallie) and 2 AMD cards.
When the 680 launched it was the fastest core Nvidia produced, it wasn't a salvaged part, it wasn't much faster than the previous gen, cards available at launch were between £420-480, they weren't close to £300.
That is because there were cards above the 970 in those price points. When the lets presume GTX 1080 comes out it will be the highest card in the range.
Did the GTX 680 launch at £300 despite being around 20% faster than the 580?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/7
no it didn't, same price, 20% faster. The 970 isn't remotely comparable because at no time was it close to the fastest card available, not even the fastest card from Nvidia.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_970_Gaming/14.html
at 1080p it was slower than 4 available Nvidia cards(one a duallie) and 2 AMD cards.
When the 680 launched it was the fastest core Nvidia produced, it wasn't a salvaged part, it wasn't much faster than the previous gen, cards available at launch were between £420-480, they weren't close to £300.
Well the people suggesting that NVidia wont release the second tier midrange card (1070) at or around the £300 price point, well you might be right, but history says other wise.
470 $349 £246
480 $499 £351
570 $349 £246
580 $499 £351
670 $400 £282
680 $500 £352
GTX Titan £800
980TI £500
Titan-X £900
Nvidia will absolutely be giving us 980Ti performance at around ~£300 soon.
Nvidia aint giving anyone 980ti performance for £300, not on this horrible earth we live in ever!
The equivalent 1080Ti will be around £650-£700 depending on brand imo. The Titan equivalent £899
no, but a 1070 should cost about £300 and be about as fast as a current 980Ti.
fixed that for you![]()
The original Titan on release was £980-£1000 not £800. I remember because I bought one. That was the cheapest I could find.
By that theory a 970 should be as quick as a 780Ti. It is not
That is because there were cards above the 970 in those price points. When the lets presume GTX 1080 comes out it will be the highest card in the range.
Did the GTX 680 launch at £300 despite being around 20% faster than the 580?
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5699/nvidia-geforce-gtx-680-review/7
no it didn't, same price, 20% faster. The 970 isn't remotely comparable because at no time was it close to the fastest card available, not even the fastest card from Nvidia.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_970_Gaming/14.html
at 1080p it was slower than 4 available Nvidia cards(one a duallie) and 2 AMD cards.
When the 680 launched it was the fastest core Nvidia produced, it wasn't a salvaged part, it wasn't much faster than the previous gen, cards available at launch were between £420-480, they weren't close to £300.
Nvidia aint giving anyone 980ti performance for £300, not on this horrible earth we live in ever!
The equivalent 1080Ti will be around £650-£700 depending on brand imo. The Titan equivalent £899
By that theory a 970 should be as quick as a 780Ti. It is not