That would be when they are using their new single pass view multiview port rendering.
Exactly. The 980 sli comparison was for actual relative gaming performance and completely makes sense looking at the specs.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That would be when they are using their new single pass view multiview port rendering.
If people think real world benchmarks of the new cards won't be as favourable as the presentation would have us believe, now might be a good time to take a gamble and snap up a 980 TI on the cheap from a panicking owner.
No, the claim relating to VR was that the 1080 was 2x faster than a Titan X in some VR scenarios.
The faster than 980 sli performance was related to actual gaming performance for the 1080. Why does this seem so outlandish to you? 2540 pascal cores at 1733mhz boost with GDDR5X, 9 Tflops compared with 2048 Maxwell cores with a 1216mhz and standard gddr5 boost clock and 5 Tflops. It sounds spot on to me.
It was also said that the 1070 would be faster than the Titan X. This makes sense looking at the Tflop rating ( all we have at the moment)
People seem to be overlooking the slides with non-VR game relative performance - on my tablet atm so can't easily link.
Well, is that standard version to standard version? Or is it founder version to standard version? What settings used in game? If the 1080 is 60% faster than the 980, that makes it about 10-15% faster than the 980Ti? Will the 1070 be only 10% slower than the 1080??
If people think real world benchmarks of the new cards won't be as favourable as the presentation would have us believe, now might be a good time to take a gamble and snap up a 980 TI on the cheap from a panicking owner.
They will drop to £200 as soon as the Pascal arrives, in what 3 weeks?
Until then, only very silly people will buy any GPU at all.
So not that silly in the grand scheme of things, just 980ti/titan owners not accepting that expensive GPU's loose value quickly.
It would do some people some good to put the shoe on the other foot for a minute - it can be argued that it's a bit dodgy trying to sell a 980ti today for £400+ when they won't be worth anything near that soon.
Vega will be 14nm - I won't be betting on Volta being on 16nm.
I'm tempted to offer something in the region of £250-300 for it, but I know come GTX1070 release i'd regret it. I do like the STRIX though, it's a brilliant cooler.
I'm tempted to offer something in the region of £250-300 for it, but I know come GTX1070 release i'd regret it. I do like the STRIX though, it's a brilliant cooler.
Would definitely regret it if you paid that kind of money. Everyone will have their brand new shiny toy, and you will feel buyers remorse.
Someone just price checked a 290 in MM for 140 no way is a 980ti worth 200
The 980Ti is only ~30% faster than a 980 so your figures are skewed
Someone just price checked a 290 in MM for 140 no way is a 980ti worth 200
Get a 1070 I would ....it's slower than a 980ti lol...
You lot amaze me with your hyped performance imaginations when no clear benchies are out...
I'm guessing your about 15
Hey, I may be young, but from what I can see I have a lot more sense than you do
That may be the case today. Won't be the case in a few weeks time however
And you know this how? First telling people not to wait and to buy 980Ti's with a node shink around the corner, now this?
Hey, I may be young, but from what I can see I have a lot more sense than you do
The 980Ti is only ~30% faster than a 980 so your figures are skewed