Yes I thought it was 256 my wrong.
The 1070 and 1080 are both 256, the 1070 is GDDR5 and the 1080 is GDDR5x, so overall the 1080 bandwidth is similar to the 980ti but the 1070 is worse.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Yes I thought it was 256 my wrong.
I just watched the press conference and one minute Jensen is saying it's faster than 980 sli then he's saying it's faster than titan x sli. Did I misinterpret?
All this nonsense that nvidia had to rush out a simple die-shrink of Maxwell is hilarious
The Async Compute problem is probably one of the most controversial issues surrounding the older generation of Geforce graphics cards from Nvidia. Something very interesting, however, is present in the press release that they sent out to, well, the press. According to the official statement, the GTX 1080 is fully capable of performing Async Compute. If this turns out to be true, then this will give negate a major edge that Radeon graphics cards from AMD have enjoyed this past year.
As in hardware capable or software?
Pair of 1070's please Sir![]()
![]()
From 2x 980ti ?
Went down to one about a month ago
Changed my mind, going for 1080's now![]()
Went down to one about a month ago
Changed my mind, going for 1080's now![]()
Single one for me, SLi and Xfires gash![]()
Shall I sell my Poseidon for 200 in MM and join you? Hmmmm
Think this is going be the first time am going back to a single GPU in how many years..Single one for me, SLi and Xfires gash![]()
Yeah its bloody terrible, ive been on a single card for months and months, 2nds disabled, just can't be bothered to pull it out (ooh err)![]()
Pascal was over 2 years in the making apparently, 7000 people involved and billions of $. As they were first to market with the last gen I expect they probably started on the next gen before the competition did who were already struggling to get something to market.
The competition who have lost market share over the last few years are hardly going to claw that back if they are behind the curve of release and when they do bring something to the table it just able matches in some aspects (give or take a water cooler to help).I'm hoping AMD do spring a surprise this time around but i fear not.
I dunno, the 1080 is what 400 cores down on the TItan x yet faster, apparently by 20%+