• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

** The Official Nvidia GeForce 'Pascal' Thread - for general gossip and discussions **

drunkenmaster said:
You do of course understand how utterly ridiculous this statement is because one, Nvidia did speak about Pascal at CES, two, Nvidia showed a 'GP100' at CES 2015, and they've talked about Pascal products like the Drive PX2 multiple times.

Aside from all that, you pretend Nvidia never said the word Pascal till a couple of days ago and forget about the previous times they talked about it at the next release when you talk about now Nvidia are utterly silent right up till launch.
Click to expand...

Strawman city here we come.

How is telling everyone nvidia cant release a gddr5x GPU before christmas working out for you now?
 
LzOAJRA.jpg


:D
 
Looking at the Ashes Bench Thread...

Average FR 46.3, GPU Fury X @1150/545, Normal FR 55.0, Medium FR 47.9, Heavy FR 38.9, CPU 3770k @4.2, Dygaza
Average FR 45.5, GPU TitanX @1501/2002, Normal FR 51.3, Medium FR 45.1, Heavy FR 41.1, CPU 5960X @4.0, Kaapstad

''In the games built in benchmark, the R9 Fury X is able to achieve a score of 4300 points with an average framerate of 44.4 FPS, with the Nvidia GTX 1080 achieving a higher score of 4900 and an average framerate of 49.6.''

Not a huge jump imo..
 
Streetlight said:
Looking at the Ashes Bench Thread...

Average FR 46.3, GPU Fury X @1150/545, Normal FR 55.0, Medium FR 47.9, Heavy FR 38.9, CPU 3770k @4.2, Dygaza
Average FR 45.5, GPU TitanX @1501/2002, Normal FR 51.3, Medium FR 45.1, Heavy FR 41.1, CPU 5960X @4.0, Kaapstad

''In the games built in benchmark, the R9 Fury X is able to achieve a score of 4300 points with an average framerate of 44.4 FPS, with the Nvidia GTX 1080 achieving a higher score of 4900 and an average framerate of 49.6.''

Not a huge jump imo..
Click to expand...

:eek:
 
Sixense said:
That's.... underwhelming? 12% over a Fury X, synthethic benches ain't everything it seems. Any game benchmarks of stuff like Witcher 3 or GTA5?
Click to expand...

It is a little. But having said that it is a DX12 benchmark and is known for really favouring toward AMD.

For example the 980Ti is about 20% slower than the fury X on the same bench.

Putting what could be a stock 1080 about 30-35% faster on this bench than a Ti and in game.
 
Last edited:
Streetlight said:
Looking at the Ashes Bench Thread...

Average FR 46.3, GPU Fury X @1150/545, Normal FR 55.0, Medium FR 47.9, Heavy FR 38.9, CPU 3770k @4.2, Dygaza
Average FR 45.5, GPU TitanX @1501/2002, Normal FR 51.3, Medium FR 45.1, Heavy FR 41.1, CPU 5960X @4.0, Kaapstad

''In the games built in benchmark, the R9 Fury X is able to achieve a score of 4300 points with an average framerate of 44.4 FPS, with the Nvidia GTX 1080 achieving a higher score of 4900 and an average framerate of 49.6.''

Not a huge jump imo..
Click to expand...

Um if the 1080 is stock it is . That is comparing it to very heavily overclocked cards.
 
My opinion is that the AOS benchmarks are 100% useless...

Because there are no clock speeds....

A 980ti could probably score that at a high clock speed, and the 1080 could be either impressive (if it is at stock speed), or underwhelming (if the 1080 is overclocked). So no way of knowing and overall pretty useless.
 
Last edited:
Look again in a week or so see cex offering same.if they cant sell those they buy at 250 their offer will drop.cant believe people still going on about it,owners defending,others a more realistic non-owning valuation. We'll see what the market thinks in coming days/weeks.if owners think they're still as good and valuable as the new products then why care -keep them
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom