• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

** The Official Nvidia GeForce 'Pascal' Thread - for general gossip and discussions **

stooeh said:
I totally agree and not only that, many games (first person shooters in particular) FEEL a lot better by upping that refresh to 70+

Input lag for me is often very noticeable at around 55 FPS or lower. Like in the new Doom for example :)
Click to expand...

60 FPS is the minimum I can tolerate.
Anything below is immediately noticeable to me, especially when I play singleplayer games with V-Sync.
 
NirK said:
but still 70 looks night and day better than 55 for example.
Click to expand...

Would you really notice the difference between a game running at 55fps and and the same game running at 70fps? Like if I put up a game running at a steady 55fps and then the same game running at a steady 70fps, that you would be able to tell which was which in a blind test?

Not doubting you, well maybe I am little, but would you genuinely be able to tell the difference?
 
melmac said:
Would you really notice the difference between a game running at 55fps and and the same game running at 70fps? Like if I put up a game running at a steady 55fps and then the same game running at a steady 70fps, that you would be able to tell which was which in a blind test?

Not doubting you, well maybe I am little, but would you genuinely be able to tell the difference?
Click to expand...

Yes I could certainly get that right 100% of the time, 55 > 70 looks very obvious to me.

Also doing a blind test to guess FPS is maybe not ideal... I guess you mean A/B test..

Do you have a 60hz monitor?
 
Last edited:
Aretak said:
Seems a little slower than a 980 Ti overclock vs overclock. Just under 20k for the graphics score in FireStrike, versus ~21k for an average 980 Ti. Probably worth the trade-off for the extra 2GB memory and 75W less power draw though. Maybe custom cards will close the gap a little too.
Click to expand...

Looks like a good 1080p or 1440p card
 
Last edited:
NirK said:
It will be a downgrade or sidegrade from the 980ti.
Click to expand...

That's funny considering that multiple benches show it beating the 980ti. Lets not forget lower power draw, and 8GB of VRAM vs 6gb

I don't get why 980ti owners are getting so salty and insecure
 
jb7 said:
That's funny considering that multiple benches show it beating the 980ti. Lets not forget lower power draw, and 8GB of VRAM vs 6gb

I don't get why 980ti owners are getting so salty and insecure
Click to expand...

Yes but the stock 980ti would get another 15-20% just from any non reference card, and at 3440x1440 1070 will be worse due to memory bandwidth. Not "salty" at all just trying to be helpful (I am not a 980ti user anymore and am not getting a 1070)

Looked at a few reviews and it looks good, but my comment was someone asking 1070 compared to 980ti at 3440x1440.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom