Poll: The Official OcUK EU Referendum Exit poll (and results discussion thread)

How did you vote in the EU Referendum?

  • Remain a member of the European Union

    Votes: 861 53.0%
  • Leave the European Union

    Votes: 763 47.0%

  • Total voters
    1,624
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why are EU so desperate to now have us leave?

Because they don't want a ball and chain round their legs pulling them down with uncertainty and instability. That's why the two year term would only every be a two year term and not extended.

They want it over and done with as quick as possible so they can get back to going about their usual lives. That's not a good thing for us, although we also need it done and dusted as quickly as possible so the markets know where we stand.
 
Anything vaguely positive in the thread is being ignored in favour of the doom and gloom of our resident economic experts. :D

Yep, if people think the countries left in the EU will suddenly stop trading with us they're crazy, the UK is a huge part of the worlds economics.

... That's the extent of my knowledge, and I won't pretend to know any more than I do to avoid sounding like those you mention!

Although one thing is for certain, France will most likely take this opportunity to apply boot to the babymakers. :D
 
Anything vaguely positive in the thread is being ignored in favour of the doom and gloom of our resident economic experts. :D

Thing is though a lot of what's being said seems to be written off as "scaremongering" by the ones who've won the vote.

I'm at a loss as to what scaremongering now could hope to achieve since the result is already done and dusted.

Could they not just be legitimate concerns which are worthy of consideration or debunking?
 
Would it have made any difference at all to people who were using it as their "balls to the establishment" vote?

Possibly not. I think the 'establishment' (the EU and our own leaders) really have failed for a long time to address the brewing 'uneducated' resentment of the public on issues like immigration. It's a problem that people felt that way in the first place.

How, pray tell, do you explain the workings of the EU to the man on the Clapham Omnibus? Of course it'll sound incredibly condescending*, but a scary proportion of people are thick, and/or don't want to put the effort into learning (or are genuinely unable to). It's not as though it's some super secret thing - anyone can go on Wikipedia and inform themselves, or head to a fact checking site, or watch eg. Paxman's documentary. I'm not sure how the remain campaign are meant to teach EU law through short soundbites/appearances on TV/campaign leaflets/etc when people wouldn't pay attention for long enough. In one phrase, you can take a horse to water...

All the above is especially true when the other side is spewing out misinformation/deliberately misleading people.

*But, in fairness, people are thick/horribly misinformed, I don't think those are unreasonable levels give, for example,

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-nearly-everything-survey-shows-a7074311.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...t-nearly-everything-survey-shows-8697821.html
I don't disagree with that sentiment at all, but that has to be offset against the fact that our population is, to a large extent, impacted (for good or worse) and controlled by what it deems to be a faceless identity. Of course, the onus is on the voters to find out information, but they are indeed lazy and I do think there is a responsibility is giving some level of information to make the voters aware of what they are doing and what the aims of the EU are.

There is accountability through MEPs and through our own leaders, sure, but there is so little interaction with MEPs and information about them that the public just doesn't even register their purpose or existence. How did it get to that position? Nobody really cared or took electing MEPs seriously... a secondary election of no real consquence.

That was the mistake - making the people think they were powerless and this vote alone gave them a voice.
 
Last edited:
*sigh*

As has been said countless times (and silly Carol), the brexit risk has been factored in to the financial markets for months and months. The pound has been suffering from this uncertainty for ages.

The rate went up to 1.51 on Thursday in the hopes it was a remain victory and was forecast to get back up to where it should be ~1.6 if we voted to remain.

We are hugely down in comparison.

It doesn't really change the point that the currency today, now the Leave vote has won, should be by far the lowest value - it isn't.
 
exactly this and is the very point that the leave campaign have ignored and simply cannot address. The EU countries will make a call that will safeguard their foundation over the long term rather than see some of the industries good over the short term. The ECB will step in to ensure that those EU countries industries stay liquid as payment for ensuring and safe guarding the long term future of the EU. The UK is not going to be able to take on 27 countries + the ECB and come out on top. This is going to be an epic damage limitation exercise for the UK and we'll be taking critical hits for full damage all over the gaf before this deal is done. What ever bone gets tossed over will be paraded as some major victory by the brexit camp, but the cold truth will be that it's actually miles away from what they were purporting they could get.

As you mention, I reckon liquidity could be a key issue if the negotiations went badly. 27 central banks versus the BoE isn't a fight we're likely to make past the first round. I doubt that it would come down to this but the EU holds so many better cards than us that this could become messy.

The key rule to negotiating is to never approach it with confidence, instead embrace it with prudence.
 
How, pray tell, do you explain the workings of the EU to the man on the Clapham Omnibus? Of course it'll sound incredibly condescending*, but a scary proportion of people are thick, and/or don't want to put the effort into learning (or are genuinely unable to). It's not as though it's some super secret thing - anyone can go on Wikipedia and inform themselves, or head to a fact checking site, or watch eg. Paxman's documentary, or a three minute video I linked to on here from the BBC which explained the £350m/week figures and how much comes back/where it goes/etc. I'm not sure how the remain campaign are meant to teach EU law through short soundbites/appearances on TV/campaign leaflets/etc when people wouldn't pay attention for long enough. In one phrase, you can take a horse to water...

All the above is especially true when the other side is spewing out misinformation/deliberately misleading people.

*But, in fairness, people are thick/horribly misinformed, I don't think those are unreasonable levels give, for example,

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-nearly-everything-survey-shows-a7074311.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...t-nearly-everything-survey-shows-8697821.html

Could also be argued that the politicians on both sides were far more interested in their soundbites rather than making any attempt at informing the public. Almost all of the debates had similar answers to every question, to the ludicrous levels of expecting someone to ask Cameron what colour the sky was, to get a soundbite on 'leap into the dark / better off together / we'll all the worse off out'. (For the record this applies to both sides even though I mentioned Cameron).

I personally don't think people in general are as stupid as many seem to believe (don't get me wrong, there are those who are very much so on both sides), but many no longer trust in the political system and those within it for any form of information (the £350m was as much of a farce as the £4300). Equally people are generally self interested and what you may see as beneficial to you may well not be to someone else. I am far more dismayed over the last few months that people see others who have differing views as simply being uneducated and unworthy of a vote.
 
Last edited:
*sigh*

As has been said countless times (and silly Carol), the brexit risk has been factored in to the financial markets for months and months. The pound has been suffering from this uncertainty for ages.

The rate went up to 1.51 on Thursday in the hopes it was a remain victory and was forecast to get back up to where it should be ~1.6 if we voted to remain.

We are hugely down in comparison.

To back that up.

Screen_Shot_2016_06_24_at_18_22_48.png


Arguing that it's just as low (actually lower) as another very low point is not a great argument.
 
People with that attitude are making me feel ill... And a little concerned about the quality of education in this country for some of its residents... :p

It's the quality of education in this country that got us into this mess in the first place. We're way down the world lists for literacy, numeracy, science etc. And you can't blame the EU for that.
 
Oh, moses, re: the 16+ year old point, I don't think that age bracket shouldn't have voted, but in this case there wasn't a drive to make them eligible until the dying days, at which point it was practically "huh, wish I could vote..." - too little too late, certaintly not enough to make people quest the legitimacy of this outcome.
 
Thing is though a lot of what's being said seems to be written off as "scaremongering" by the ones who've won the vote.

I'm at a loss as to what scaremongering now could hope to achieve since the result is already done and dusted.

Could they not just be legitimate concerns which are worthy of consideration or debunking?

This is the Internet and a lot of people have lost an Internet argument - that is serious to a lot of people.

In all seriousness the doom and gloom seems to be largely based on the EU taking revenge and punishing us (which I don't believe - money talks) but what that does do is reinforce to me that WE have made the right decision.
 
Not saying that it is what you think, but it is the rhetoric that would be going around. The referendum started becoming less spiteful the moment the Tories defected meaning more than UKIP were part of Leave.

And a referendum is democracy in action, if the government were to go against the outcome it would cause an uproar. more so than the disdain of many remain people, there would possibly have been rioting due to people hitting breaking point when it comes to contempt for the government.

People vote politicians to do the job...

Having a PM not elected isn't democracy, in Italy we have that sh** face that no one voted being Merkel's puppy as the French's (Well at least he was elected).

As I always said the only way to reset the whole thing is a war.......Germany never learn...it never did...it never will...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom