Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,056
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
That's on condole
***The Official Starfield Thread*** (As endorsed by TNA)
- Thread starter Tek81
- Start date
30fps on consoles, 60fps on PCs. I won't be surprised if the PC modders get involved in stripping out the FPS and resolution limits.
Fidelity > Framerate is what they were thinking
Yeh, but the game is still using Creation Engine 2, which in Fallout 4 was broken (I know there's a mod for it) above 60 fps, maybe it still applies.
Soldato
- Joined
- 1 May 2013
- Posts
- 9,913
- Location
- M28
What happened since this morning? See the cult or Roberts are trying to get more backers, you know you have your own thread where we can mock you 
Stability and a constant 30Fps rather than frame drops when things get busy I suspect. If it ran at 90 and then dropped to sub 50 when things got busy there'd be loads of complaints.
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 1,205
- Location
- Scotland
I do feel this will be the most stable game they release and I want to play it but waiting for the first patch might be the way. Part of me hopes they give some people an earlier head start so we find out, with enough time to grab it and start playing if it's ok.
I'm looking forward to them showing more of the ui off as the looting window that popped up was awful. Nice and fast but far to little information.
I'm looking forward to them showing more of the ui off as the looting window that popped up was awful. Nice and fast but far to little information.
Guess if its a slow paced game 30fps is fine. I've played many games (on PC late 90s > early 2000s) at 30fps and less
Caporegime
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2008
- Posts
- 25,056
- Location
- Lorville - Hurston
The FPS combat part doesnt seem slow paced so at 60fps it would feel nice
Yes, but it's 30
Only on consoles, proper gamers on PCs can play it at 60
Associate
- Joined
- 16 Jan 2005
- Posts
- 2,395
- Location
- South Wales
Long shot that it’s going to support ultrawide on the PC, but here’s hoping.
Can't find any confirmation that it will.
It would be stupefying if it wasn't in from the get go, but this is Bethesda we are talking about.
That's quite a good update actually, nothing too surprising I was pretty confident they would not have ground vehicles for example.
I'm still a bit concerned about the 1000 planets and the proceedurally generated bit with added made parts on, very much like no man's sky that....
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,237
Well, SC/SQ42 is a more refined, better performing ArmA 3 in space, while Starfield is a Fallout in space.
One is player skill driven, the other character skill driven (as the guy said it).
One is more developed towards the realistic side, with complex side gameplay, the other is tune down, simplified arcade for everyday crowd.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 3,237
Procedural generation is not necessarily bad if it has enough variables to work with. Probably it won't though.
I think two more to add to that are
One is a multiplayer focus, one is a single player focus and one is less story/rpg focused and one is more story/rpg focused.
Something for everyone there in whichever title fits what the individual is looking for.