***The Official Starfield Thread*** (As endorsed by TNA)

Some people are masochists.

I think the majority of people, going off of Steam reviews, think it is average at best.
Steam reviews can only be positive or negative - the majority of Steam reviews for Starfield (65.15%) are positive.

Untitled.jpg
 
Steam reviews can only be positive or negative - the majority of Steam reviews for Starfield (65.15%) are positive.

Untitled.jpg
The last 30 days saw only 54% positive reviews. Compare that to 98% for Baldur's Gate 3 (96% overall) :D I get why some people like it, but the lack of a true open world with little exploration and a boring story killed it for me. Just hope they get it right for ES6.
 
The last 30 days saw only 54% positive reviews. Compare that to 98% for Baldur's Gate 3 (96% overall) :D I get why some people like it, but the lack of a true open world with little exploration and a boring story killed it for me. Just hope they get it right for ES6.
I'm not going to debate the quality of the two games as they're very different products for very different audiences - but I suspect that BG3 has earned its 98% by being an uncommonly well made game *and* a game with a very specific (and under-served) audience - 'proper' CRPG's are pretty thin on the ground these days so if you make one and make it well then it's going to win you a lot of love - and deservedly so.

It doesn't hurt that it was a successful re-imagining of a fondly remembered IP either - plus, it coincided with Dungeons & Dragons seeing a resurgence in popularity due in part to the pandemic, but also the success of streamers like Critical Role.

All you can really glean from Starfield's review numbers is that it's a divisive game - and that's not really adding anything new to the conversation. Some reviews call it a 'loading simulator' - and sure, the loading is egregious and the game would be far better without it - did that stop me from enjoying the game? Absolutely not.

You say the game has little exploration but I've spent many hours discovering derelict ships, space stations and side-quests that take you to a bunch of unique locations - and I had fun doing it - but that's me and if you found it lacking then that's valid too.

Personally I'll never play Baldur's Gate 3 for a multitude of reasons:

I don't like 5th Edition D&D.
I never played the original Baldur's Gate games.
I played a bunch of traditional CRPGs (like the Gold Box stuff from SSI) when they were new and have zero nostalgia for them.
I find the Forgotten Realms to be the blandest, most cookie-cutter of fantasy settings.

Also (subjectively) I find the art style of BG3 to be ugly and unappealing.

That's fine though - BG3 wasn't made for me and I'm happy the people playing it are enjoying themselves and getting to play something that was clearly a passion project for its creators.

What I don't do is hang out on the BG3 thread telling people why they shouldn't enjoy it :)
 
Last edited:
@TheSwede built a new ship :D

This one isn't as god-tier as the last one but I wanted to try making something out of all-Taiyo parts. Those engines are crazy though (Class C, only 2 power each!) as are the front two turrets (320 305 damage for the pair :eek:)

Photo-2023-12-09-184007.jpg
 
Last edited:
@TheSwede built a new ship :D

This one isn't as god-tier as the last one but I wanted to try making something out of all-Taiyo parts. Those engines are crazy though (Class C, only 2 power each!) as are the front two turrets (320 damage for the pair :eek:)

Thanks, looks like a cargo ship ?! Would you mind adding a screenie from when in the ship builder so all the stats can be shown ?

On another note, here is a fun video about 'first time' ship building. Or at least I thought the youtube guy was entertaining in the way he made the video ! (ignore the image at first, that ship way to stylish in looks for being a Starfield ship ! :p )

 
Thanks, looks like a cargo ship ?! Would you mind adding a screenie from when in the ship builder so all the stats can be shown ?

On another note, here is a fun video about 'first time' ship building. Or at least I thought the youtube guy was entertaining in the way he made the video ! (ignore the image at first, that ship way to stylish in looks for being a Starfield ship ! :p )

Sure - this one shows the stats before the bonuses are applied for skills:

Starfield-09-12-2023-19-11-56.jpg


This one includes the skill bonuses (except for particle beams/turrets oddly - also, ignore the 'value' - that's always wrong):

Starfield-09-12-2023-19-13-03.jpg


It's a considerable downgrade from the other one (slower, less cargo, less crew/passengers and less weapons) but I spent a lot of time looking for the perfect combination of parts on my previous ship whereas this one was more 'what can I build with just this vendor?'

Thanks for the link! I thought this video was neat - it shows the snapping 'trick':

 
With that attitude, I doubt he'll be missed. I can't wait for the Creation Kit to drop so I can start making new ship/outpost parts :)

By the way, @mrk - in the short time Starfield has been out, there are 5919 mods on Nexus - which means it'll surpass Cyberpunk (7328) soon :o

Surely the number of mods a game has, is indicative as to how bad it is?

For example top rated polished games:
GTA V - 514 mods (10 years old)
Mass Effect 3 - 690 mods (11 years old)
Assassins Creed Valhalla -199 mods
God of War - 154 mods
Borderlands 2 - 270 mods
Days Gone - 472 mods
Dying Light - 822 mods
Resident Evil Village - 425 mods
Far Cry 6 - 61 mods
Last of Us - 46 mods
Alan Wake 2 - 21 mods
Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 142 mods

Starfield having 5919 mods in 3 months since release is nothing to brag about, it is a result of the community trying to fix a broken / unfinished game.
Modding is just turd polishing.
 
Modding is just turd polishing.
Tell that to the Skyrim community (68,000+ mods).

Bethesda games have a lot of mods because they make their development tools freely available and the script-based nature of the Creation Engine makes it pretty easy to implement your ideas - I made all of these and they mostly took me minutes to do:


BTW, I see you didn't mention Baldur's Gate 3 (3,900 mods) - yep - what a turd :p
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to debate the quality of the two games as they're very different products for very different audiences - but I suspect that BG3 has earned its 98% by being an uncommonly well made game *and* a game with a very specific (and under-served) audience - 'proper' CRPG's are pretty thin on the ground these days so if you make one and make it well then it's going to win you a lot of love - and deservedly so.

It doesn't hurt that it was a successful re-imagining of a fondly remembered IP either - plus, it coincided with Dungeons & Dragons seeing a resurgence in popularity due in part to the pandemic, but also the success of streamers like Critical Role.

All you can really glean from Starfield's review numbers is that it's a divisive game - and that's not really adding anything new to the conversation. Some reviews call it a 'loading simulator' - and sure, the loading is egregious and the game would be far better without it - did that stop me from enjoying the game? Absolutely not.

You say the game has little exploration but I've spent many hours discovering derelict ships, space stations and side-quests that take you to a bunch of unique locations - and I had fun doing it - but that's me and if you found it lacking then that's valid too.

Personally I'll never play Baldur's Gate 3 for a multitude of reasons:

I don't like 5th Edition D&D.
I never played the original Baldur's Gate games.
I played a bunch of traditional CPRGs (like the Gold Box stuff from SSI) when they were new and have zero nostalgia for them.
I find the Forgotten Realms to be the blandest, most cookie-cutter of fantasy settings.

Also (subjectively) I find the art style of BG3 to be ugly and unappealing.

That's fine though - BG3 wasn't made for me and I'm happy the people playing it are enjoying themselves and getting to play something that was clearly a passion project for its creators.

What I don't do is hang out on the BG3 thread telling people why they shouldn't enjoy it :)
I just expected something better from Bethesda. I have enjoyed some of their previous games like Morrowind, Oblivion, Skyrim and Fallout 3 and 4 (Haven't played Fallout 76) and this is easily my least favourite. Not saying I didn't enjoy parts of it (The Crimson Fleet missions were good and I didn't mind some of the ship combat) but the main mission was pretty dull as were most of the companions (Apart from Andreja). I found most of the 1000+ planets to be lifeless and just a copy/paste of the last one. Also having to run everywhere got old quick. Glad I played it, but I doubt I will go back to it even when the DLC drops.

You should at least give BG3 a try if you wait for a price drop. I have never played a D&D game myself or the other two BG games, but I enjoyed my time with BG3.
 
Did a few radiant quests yesterday to make some money for my next ship - one took me to a planet where I found a new power (don't have 'em all yet) - after that I bumped into a ship selling planetary data so I bought a few - they're not important (go to the cave on 'x' and find 'x') but whatever - I wasn't in a rush. Then I came across a 'derelict' ship where the crew was still alive but they all spoke with robot voices and the captain had been murdered :eek:

This game doesn't really do 'horror' but it really nails 'creepy as f...' :D

Oh, I also found a ship where a discharged UC veteran had killed himself 'cause his wife had left him - gave the poor fella a Viking funeral - was the least I could do :(
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom