Hi all, first post!
Just wanted add to this thread about my dissapointment with the 1950 Pro AGP, and to find out if I am doing anything wrong.
I have the HIS x1950 Pro AGP 512Mb, with Asus P4B800S-X. P4 2.8/533 Northwood @ 3.1/589. 1Gb PC3200 (2.5-3-3-7).
Basically, used Asus auto settings for a 10% overclock. Nice and stable.
The HIS is all at stock, and I get 6214 3DMark2005, BUT my previous card, X800XT PE was getting 5541 at stock, which is not much of an increase, especially considering the £187 + del for the card, and the additional £80 for the Corsair HX 520 that I have had to order as the XPower 450watt supply doesn't seem man enough to keep the HIS happy.
It will run 3Dmark2005 as previously stated, but if I run ATI Tool (latest version) after about 30 seconds with the 3D display running, it black-screens, and I have to power cycle the machine. Also get the same when running FEAR. BF2 and COD seem happy. Temps are fine so assuming its power thats the issue.
Also, does 6214 seem like a reasonable score on my current setup to you guys?
One of my mates has exact same motherboard, but P4 Prescott 3.0 HT/800 + 1Gb ram, and he has the lower-clocked Sapphire x1950 pro 512Mb AGP and he is getting 7100ish in 3dMark2005. Is the HT making the difference, or is it the FSB that is causing the gap?
I feel a bit gutted that I have effectively had to pay almost £300 for an extra 650 3dmarks, and I could probably even reduce figure that if I overclocked the 800XT.
Anyway, I feel better for my rant - any comments (as long as they are constructive

) are welcome