And rather heavy. The support bracket is definitely needed.Yes, I did briefly look at the Red Devil and Pulse, but the Nitro+ won out on strength of reviews. I think I prefer the look of the Red Devilbut the Nitro+ is by all accounts a quality bit of kit.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The Radeon RX 7900 XT(X) Owners Thread.
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
Caporegime
Leave the min frequency at 500Mhz, RDNA3 behaves differently to RDNA2. Putting it a few hundred Mhz below the max frequency is not advisable. Also, don’t overclock the card, at least not yet. Use it as stock and if you want a little extra performance up the power limit to +15%.
Happy with my RX 7900 XT.
Pro-tip. A custom resolution of approx 3624 x 2038 will give you around 90% of the pixels of 4K resolution, or you can just use an in game resolution scaler. In Warhammer III, I can run at 90% of 4K (Ultra Preset) and get 1% lows of 64 in the battle benchmark. For some reason, the in game resolution scaler gives me a bit better framerate than a custom resolution in this game.
If you have an RX 7900 XTX, I'd guess that 4K resolution wouldn't be an issue in this game.
It's nice to know that my PC isn't CPU bottlenecked, as I can get 1% lows of 67 FPS in the CPU heavy 'Mirrors of Madness' benchmark (when the resolution is scaled down), which has a ton of units and things going on.
Pro-tip. A custom resolution of approx 3624 x 2038 will give you around 90% of the pixels of 4K resolution, or you can just use an in game resolution scaler. In Warhammer III, I can run at 90% of 4K (Ultra Preset) and get 1% lows of 64 in the battle benchmark. For some reason, the in game resolution scaler gives me a bit better framerate than a custom resolution in this game.
If you have an RX 7900 XTX, I'd guess that 4K resolution wouldn't be an issue in this game.
It's nice to know that my PC isn't CPU bottlenecked, as I can get 1% lows of 67 FPS in the CPU heavy 'Mirrors of Madness' benchmark (when the resolution is scaled down), which has a ton of units and things going on.
Last edited:
What's weird about quite a few modern games, is that TAA High often looks worse (more artifacts / errors and blurriness) than TAA Low, and consumes more performance.
I've noticed it in Warhammer 3 and Hogwarts at 4K resolution. I suppose they overdo it as bit, to help with resolutions like 1440p and 1080p.
In Hogwarts, it seems like it's worth playing at 4K native, it looks noticeably more detailed than any of the Quality upscaling options (maybe DLSS Quality would be nearly as good though).
I've noticed it in Warhammer 3 and Hogwarts at 4K resolution. I suppose they overdo it as bit, to help with resolutions like 1440p and 1080p.
In Hogwarts, it seems like it's worth playing at 4K native, it looks noticeably more detailed than any of the Quality upscaling options (maybe DLSS Quality would be nearly as good though).
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,114
Tbh when I want an fps boost I set an Ultrawide res of 3840x1600 and find that gives me a great boost (6.1 vs 8.2m pixels), but I suppose I can do that using such a large screen
(it's like having a 40in Ultrawide).
Last edited:
I just tried a demanding 2018 game made by some Czech developers - Kingdom Come: Deliverance (which had a Czech language pack added a few months ago!). I can run it smoothly at 4K Ultra with all the sliders turned up, just one option needed to be turned down. I rode a horse around Rattay at night and the 1% lows remain >60 FPS.
The shadows are really demanding on the Ultra setting, I could barely see any difference in the quality when turning the setting down to Medium. I guess you still need a RX 7900 XTX to see those Ultra shadows
AMD's image sharpening helps with this game quite a bit (some with Hogwarts at native resolution).
It's games like this that make me glad I didn't opt for a last gen GPU (e.g. RX 6900 XT).
Bring on Kingdom Come 2!
The shadows are really demanding on the Ultra setting, I could barely see any difference in the quality when turning the setting down to Medium. I guess you still need a RX 7900 XTX to see those Ultra shadows
AMD's image sharpening helps with this game quite a bit (some with Hogwarts at native resolution).
It's games like this that make me glad I didn't opt for a last gen GPU (e.g. RX 6900 XT).
Bring on Kingdom Come 2!
Last edited:
I just noticed that there aren't any RX 7000 series GPUs listed on Steam's hardware survey yet.
RDNA3 never really got going, did it?
Maybe the 7700 XT will make an impact, when it eventually releases, if the RX 6700 XT is anything to go by (it's installed in about 0.5% of PCs, so not a lot either).
RDNA3 never really got going, did it?
Maybe the 7700 XT will make an impact, when it eventually releases, if the RX 6700 XT is anything to go by (it's installed in about 0.5% of PCs, so not a lot either).
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2020
- Posts
- 1,462
Neither has Ada.
They have AMD Radeon Graphics in the list what's that for ?
Associate
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2020
- Posts
- 1,462
AMDs main market is CPU and server CPU/APU etc. GPUs were never their priority.
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,114
GPU's just feel like a means to an end for AMD, just to serve their APU/console markets.
It's a shame that PC APUs are so low power and low end compared to what you get with a Series X console.
I suppose I'd want something about as good as a RTX 3060 TI or ideally a RX 6800 for an APU, so that you can play at 1080p Ultra. But they would have to cost much more then current APUs. I think if they could do that, it would make desktop PCs seem much more appealing relative to consoles.
Last edited:
Soldato
If they would just sell the level of APU that's in their laptops or mini-PCs for a desktop system, I'd be happy.
"New driver, new table.
Same story, ddu previous driver, uninstall chipset driver. Install new driver, install chipset driver, run benches."
Same story, ddu previous driver, uninstall chipset driver. Install new driver, install chipset driver, run benches."
| Driver | FireStrike | FS Extreme | FS Ultra | TimeSpy | TS Extreme | Speed Way | Port Royal |
| 4080 Trinity OC + 528.29 W10 Pro SR | 68609 | 34777 | 17694 | 28372 | 14147 | 7237 | 17804 |
| 7900 XTX Red Devil + 23.2.2 W10 Pro SR | 80771 | 39176 | 19973 | 29118 | 14677 | 6063 | 15850 |
| 7900 XTX Nitro+ 23.2.2 W10 Pro SR | 80956 | 40863 | 20865 | 30339 | 15073 | 6153 | 16379 |
| Nitro+ 23.3.1 W10 Pro SR | 80713 | 40615 | 20728 | 30467 | 15067 | 6268 | 16331 |
| Nitro+ 23.3.2 W10 Pro SR | 81003 | 40982 | 20934 | 30727 | 15188 | 6278 | 16551 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.1 W10 Pro SR | 80999 | 41028 | 20909 | 30639 | 15142 | 6276 | 16560 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.2 W10 Pro SR | 81441 | 41213 | 21038 | 30691 | 15226 | 6468 | 16779 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.2 W10 Pro - New Ram 1 SR | 82412 | 41637 | 21150 | 30759 | 15280 | 6499 | 16880 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.2 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR | 82967 | 41686 | 21150 | 30934 | 15328 | 6483 | 16844 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.3 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR / Round 2 | 82674 | 41639 | 21096 | 30964 | 15325 | 6477 | 16784 |
| Nitro+ 23.5.1 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR | 83044 | 41563 | 21065 | 30951 | 15342 | 6489 | 16803 |
| Nitro+ 23.5.2 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR | 81409 | 41148 | 20937 | 30881 | 15222 | 6453 | 16733 |
Received the 7900 XT TUF today, I knew it was big but underestimated just how big this thing is! Reading around reviews and various forums had me a bit worried about coil whine but happy to find it's not noticeable and the card is really quiet overall.
Yes I would like to know if they are looking at the VR performance
Associate
Let us know how you get on.