gtfo, how dare you bring Harry into this, of course he is a real wizard!!
The rise of OnlyFans
- Thread starter Narj
- Start date
This is an interesting point but I don’t think it’s true. Isn’t it just a way for women to show off their painted toenails
Associate
I think I was entirely drunk when I replied to this.
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,412
Surveys and studies suggest the majority of women prefer athletic builds to strong or developed builds, and that an overall balanced or well-proportioned musculature is preferable to a focus on any particular grouping, such as arms, chest or legs. However, it was men who thought that the stronger builds were more attractive.
By either your definition or mine, which says basically the same thing, arms are not considered sexual organs and thus are technically a fetish.
Be sure you're not confusing this with the concept of kink, which requires the attraction/focus to be considered unusual.
Are boobs now regarded as non-sexual?Next you'll be telling me men liking boobs is a fetish.
Not every woman paints her nails, but for most who do it's another part of showing off that part of the body, so open shoes that reveal the painting contribute to that accentuation. I doubt any but the most extreme of fetishists are going to be admiring the choice of colour, the smoothness of her brush-stroking, the precision of her cutting-in, or the pristine sheen on her finish.
Many women consider their feet erogenous zones and objects of focus, so they wear shoes designed to make them look dainty, slim and shapely, hence the designs that so often cripple their toes.
Associate
Sad times where degradation is taking over real human feelings and at the same time being encouraged. Fear for next gen and onwards
Fair play to them.
Last edited:
One of those hypothetical questions came up between me and my gf today.
We were talking about male/female stuff. Came down to me saying if I was in my 20s now would I prefer to be a man or a woman. I said woman. As I could be so rich and not have to do some dull job like I have now.
Surprised more women aren't on OF. I know not everyone makes it. But you don't need much to get something from it.
We were talking about male/female stuff. Came down to me saying if I was in my 20s now would I prefer to be a man or a woman. I said woman. As I could be so rich and not have to do some dull job like I have now.
Surprised more women aren't on OF. I know not everyone makes it. But you don't need much to get something from it.
Caporegime
Don’t be fooled by what you see on social media. It’s a minuscule percentage of content creators who make a living wage off the platform.
Market is situated now and flooded with women barely making anything.
Also there are plenty of websites pirating their content now.
Last edited:
There's a very steep Lorenz curve, some girls earn a great income, some are instant millionaires even. Many more are getting say £50 a month to show their boobs and fanny to a couple of incels they went to school/uni with, their dad's creepy mate and a few random strangers.
They need a sales funnel* and if they're don't otherwise have an initial following elsewhere then they need other girls with an existing network to refer them/collect referral fees and help promote them.
*Reddit, Instagram, dating sites etc.. the PhotoAI app creator has mentioned that one of it's uses was to create multiple fresh photos of the same girl in order to create more fake Tinder profiles with links to her Instagram etc.. and in turn to her OF site. Likewise, viral tweets often have controversial or funny or just dirty comments from OF bots (or min wage humans in the third world) trying to promote some girl's site.
Celebs and social media people with a following or people who managed to go viral for something can make a fortune - for example, this former reality TV guest has made 60 million from it.
Bhad Bhabie Flaunts Staggering $57M OnlyFans Earnings After Allegedly Being Assaulted By Her Ex
Bhad Bhabie revealed on Instagram that she has earned a jaw-dropping sum of $57 million from OnlyFans since 2021.
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,109
Only 41 employees on companies house accounts? Surely that can't be right can it, who the hell does the moderation
Caporegime
It is a massive problem in schools and luckily something my daughter is now realising.
Kids now think they will end up as some rich influencer/streamer or model and cannot be bothered with an actual education.
You always had that rich 1% in our youth but it was always hidden because we didn't have social media. Now everyone can see how the super rich live and think it will be the same for them.
You got more probability winning the lottery than getting rich from things like Onlyfans or YouTube.
Matt Armstrong for example is a complete novice compared to some other car YouTube content creators but his stuff has gone off the charts virally without rhyme or reason. Congratulations to him but there are thousands who make sod all if not less than a minimum wage job would pay for the hours invested.
@adam cool dude The thing with Matt Armstrong is that he seems incredibly likeable with his child like enthusiasm for what he does. I'm not really a car guy, but regularly watch his videos.
My teenage daughter, mentioned wanting to be a Youtuber or influencer a couple of years back like most kids. Fortunately, despite her mental health issues she tends to listen to me. My advice was if it's something she wants to do when older, do it as a hobby and if something comes of it then great.
As for only simps, I really don't see the point... The vast majority of these slappers are at best average looking and tend to lack the personality that god bestowed to the common variety house brick. Those that perhaps have something more about them, well lets just say if I found out my missus had done stuff like that she'd be dumped. We are all grown ups and understand everyone has a past but prostitution that's all over the internet is not something I could accept.
My teenage daughter, mentioned wanting to be a Youtuber or influencer a couple of years back like most kids. Fortunately, despite her mental health issues she tends to listen to me. My advice was if it's something she wants to do when older, do it as a hobby and if something comes of it then great.
As for only simps, I really don't see the point... The vast majority of these slappers are at best average looking and tend to lack the personality that god bestowed to the common variety house brick. Those that perhaps have something more about them, well lets just say if I found out my missus had done stuff like that she'd be dumped. We are all grown ups and understand everyone has a past but prostitution that's all over the internet is not something I could accept.
Caporegime
I don't have a comment on the thread but this is beautifully/horribly worded. Kudos
Thanks mags, that's high praise from you.
I presume there is a small army of overseas contract workers who have the rather unpleasant task of reviewing whatever it is managed to offend girls who rate penises for money.
If you are talking about OF the company. They don't need to do any moderation. The individual creators hire their own army of men to respond to all the comments and DMs.
Been seeing random posts on twitter and insta about how they updated their terms and conditions and apparently a lot of the so called 'models' have some random disclaimer now on their main page saying something along the lines of "my team is authorised to reply on my behalf."
All well and good, but they weren't responding 'on their behalf' were they? They were 100% pretending to be the so called 'model' in question. So slapping this little disclaimer in like it's some get of jail card probably won't do much good when Onlyfans gets dragged to court over this.
All well and good, but they weren't responding 'on their behalf' were they? They were 100% pretending to be the so called 'model' in question. So slapping this little disclaimer in like it's some get of jail card probably won't do much good when Onlyfans gets dragged to court over this.
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,109
Well apparantly they check every single content post for things that are banned/illegal/underage etc, I don't mean replying to posts or responding to the simps sending pics of their snatch.
They aren't doing that with 41 employees
Last edited: