The rise of OnlyFans

It already is how many webcam businesses work, especially in Eastern Europe. Quite a few of the girls are sat in rows, each within their little 'film set', while a team off camera handles all the 'interactions'. They play music to cover some of the background noise, but you'll occasionally hear other 'performers' or see them cross each others' camera lines. The excuse is usually something about housemates, with the insinuation that there are whole communities of single horny females walking around naked in houseshares together, in whatever part of Eastern Europe they claim to be in.

The OF self-trading only works to a certain level of followers/patreons, after which you need support staff to keep up with the custom requests and manage all the 'interactive' correspondence.

For some of the live chatroom stuff, yes, but when it gets too busy they instigate the Private sessions. Some are paid for, others are staged to entice viewers to either buy their own session or pay to 'spy' on the secret ggoings-on.
You Sir, are a man of culture!

A good informative reply.
 
Now can we all get on the same page at least and agree foot fetishes are a bit weird?

Apologies for those who I've just kink shamed....
 
Now can we all get on the same page at least and agree foot fetishes are a bit weird?
Nope.

Fetish: a form of sexual desire in which gratification is strongly linked to a particular object or activity or a part of the body other than the sexual organs.
There are plenty of things for which any given individual may have a fetish, that others think is weird. Many women like men with strong arms. That is technically a fetish.
Many womens' shoes are designed to be revealing and accentuate the foot, in part because feet are a fetish for enough people.

A foot-job may not be to your personal taste or mine, but it's seemingly to that of many others, to the point where it's not even unusual enough to qualify as a kink.
 
I have just seen something on X that I never wanted to see.

Why!?!

Lol if you go looking, I'm literally posting so I'm not alone in this visual assault.
 
No, it's natural biological attraction.
Only for those who find it attractive. It's not a universal thing, hence being classed as a fetish by the definition of the term, even if it's a majority that embrace it.
If the attraction is toward something non-tangible and is considered unusual or uncommon, that's when it becomes a kink.
 
Only for those who find it attractive. It's not a universal thing, hence being classed as a fetish by the definition of the term, even if it's a majority that embrace it.

I would say most women are attracted by men with strong arms. Well-developed muscles in men are a sign of sexual fitness. So sorry, it's basic biological attraction and not a fetish.

Fetish definition "any object, part of the body, or activity that is ordinarily regarded as nonsexual and causes a habitual erotic response or fixation."

Next you'll be telling me men liking boobs is a fetish. :cry:
 
Back
Top Bottom