The rise of OnlyFans

The fact men really (I'm sure there's women falling for it also, but lets face it, it's mostly guys) buy into the idea they're genuinely interacting with the person on the screen is depressing.

Part of me has no sympathy, another thinks it's indicative that the platform takes advantage of vulnerable people.

"A fool and his money are soon parted."
 
In your example phone sex is a more mental exercise because you have to do the imagining.
Can you not imagine she's genuine and single, then?

In situations were a male is replying whilst the girl is acting like she's typing the mental connection is undermined.
Ha ha... Next you'll be telling me WWF wrestling is fake, and that Harry Potter isn't a real wizard...!!

You're paying a girl to pretend she's interested. It should be presumed that everything she does is faked, including interacting directly with you.
It's basically AI porn, without the intelligence part.

On a side note Andrew Tate mentions doing this very thing in his interviews.
He sits naked and plays with himself while guys pay money to pretend he's doing it especially for them?
No wonder he's rich.....

Tate went on to say most women don't know what to say to guys beyond small talk.
Oh, well if Tate says it, it must be true.....!!

I just found the article interesting considering the sites blab about building 'authentic connections with the creator' when its almost certainly not the creator you're talking to.
You probably are talking to the creator... it's just that the naked model is merely a figurehead for the channel, and not the one who did the creating.
 
Can you not imagine she's genuine and single, then?
For some reason assuming shes single is the starting point for everything like this. It's a real phenomenon, and is why online women prefer to give the illusion they are single.

I posted a link to an article before of the top female streamers noticing they don't make as much money if the audience knows they have a boyfriend/husband.

I know this isn't on the same level. But when we think of a prostitute we don't assume they are married with kids. If we did many people wouldn't approach them.

You're paying a girl to pretend she's interested. It should be presumed that everything she does is faked, including interacting directly with you.
It's basically AI porn, without the intelligence part.
I think a growing number of people these days don't care. There are people who are turned on looking at drawings.
 
Oh, well if Tate says it, it must be true.....!!

To be fair, this is one of the reasons why Bumble changed their matching policy a few weeks back. Leaving it in the hands of women to say nothing more than just "hi" wasn't working for the platform anymore with small talk.
 
Last edited:
I know this isn't on the same level. But when we think of a prostitute we don't assume they are married with kids. If we did many people wouldn't approach them.
I think a growing number of people these days don't care. There are people who are turned on looking at drawings.
Whichever way you try it, be that phone sex, internet chatrooms, online camgirls or whatever, they're all selling a fantasy.
With that in mind, it's the fantasy, and thus illusion, of a "genuine connection", so I think it's unreasonable to complain when you get exactly what you pay for.

To be fair, this is one of the reasons why Bumble changed their matching policy a few weeks back. Leaving it in the hands of women to say nothing more than just "hi" wasn't working for the platform anymore with small talk.
I don't know what Bumble specifically is (presumably a dating site) but has anyone considered that most women don't care to say anything more to the types of men they find on the apps?
Given the sort who seem taken in by Tate and his ilk, I imagine most women would run a mile, if they didn't need the money...
 
Whichever way you try it, be that phone sex, internet chatrooms, online camgirls or whatever, they're all selling a fantasy.
With that in mind, it's the fantasy, and thus illusion, of a "genuine connection", so I think it's unreasonable to complain when you get exactly what you pay for.

I agree with the fantasy part, though I guess it's how far into the fantasy we want to go.

I draw the line at someone else being involved, especially when it's not obvious.
 
Last edited:

God help the poor guy that settles down with her. Jesus...

I like that she had the audacity to ask her dad to vote for her in the Adult Industry Awards for best blowjob. Just madness. I bet he hates his life.

As a father of a daughter I can only imagine the pain he is going through. You raise your kids as best as you can and they end up like that!
 
I don't know what Bumble specifically is (presumably a dating site) but has anyone considered that most women don't care to say anything more to the types of men they find on the apps?

You dont know about Bumble is, yet you know what OnlyFan is? :confused:

As for consideration that most women don't care to say anything more to the types of men they find on the apps. Tell that to the CEO of Bumble, it was created by a woman.
 
Last edited:
I agree with the fantasy part, though I guess it's how far into the fantasy we want to go.
I draw the line at someone else being involved, especially when it's not obvious.
When you're online with 3-4,000 blokes all pinging messages at you and expecting a personal response, there's no way you're going to retain more than two or three of them... and since the majority will be asking the same questions, it makes sense for the chatroom admins and mods (and any other staff) to be ghost-writing the responses.

You dont know about Bumble is, yet you know what OnlyFan is?
I presumed it was a dataing site/app, one of the great many out there, so no I don't know every single dating app.... OF is almost unique, although there are a handful of other sites somewhat similar to it, but certainly not as many as there are basic dating ones.

As for consideration that most women don't care to say anything more to the types of men they find on the apps. Tell that to the CEO of Bumble, it was created by a woman.
So?
She's making money off guys simping at her girls. Doesn't in any way impact the fact that most women still probably don't wanna talk to the simpers.

AI GF is surely cheaper and more loyal
What does the average software programmer make?
What does the average OF girl make after the various site fees, percentages and deductions?
Presuming both will be priced according to cost of content production, I expect the OF ones will still be cheaper... plus they also won't use logical reasoning to identify you as a simping loser and dump you... or erase you, or something. They might dox you, they might auto-add you to the Sex Offenders register, or they might just strap you into The Matrix and use your body for power.

Who knows.....!!
 

God help the poor guy that settles down with her. Jesus...

I like that she had the audacity to ask her dad to vote for her in the Adult Industry Awards for best blowjob. Just madness. I bet he hates his life.
Women with this level of degeneracy will never find happiness.

So many ex porn stars are totally broken and regret it all.
 
AI GFs could deal with thousands of men at once. :eek:
surely you'd want your own personal one though.

it'll probably be a service people subscribe to in the future.

like an AI partner on your social medias that posts fake moments and photos with you inside them, giving the appearance to coworkers/family etc that they aren't a sad loner.
but a fake GF you can also chat to.

there's people already who hire escorts purely to attend weddings etc with them or because they don't want to eat out alone.

there's a guy somewhere in Japan/china who sells his services as a friend, I think hes kinda famous over there.

I remember seeing a viral youtube video about him.

the futures bleak
 
Last edited:
When you're online with 3-4,000 blokes all pinging messages at you and expecting a personal response, there's no way you're going to retain more than two or three of them... and since the majority will be asking the same questions, it makes sense for the chatroom admins and mods (and any other staff) to be ghost-writing the responses.
I think it would be a big possibility with webcam businesses. But one of the advantages of OF, and similar, is the women are self traders.

A lot of it is voice these days. It'll be interesting how fast AI moves in to audio.
 
I think it would be a big possibility with webcam businesses. But one of the advantages of OF, and similar, is the women are self traders.
It already is how many webcam businesses work, especially in Eastern Europe. Quite a few of the girls are sat in rows, each within their little 'film set', while a team off camera handles all the 'interactions'. They play music to cover some of the background noise, but you'll occasionally hear other 'performers' or see them cross each others' camera lines. The excuse is usually something about housemates, with the insinuation that there are whole communities of single horny females walking around naked in houseshares together, in whatever part of Eastern Europe they claim to be in.

The OF self-trading only works to a certain level of followers/patreons, after which you need support staff to keep up with the custom requests and manage all the 'interactive' correspondence.

A lot of it is voice these days. It'll be interesting how fast AI moves in to audio.
For some of the live chatroom stuff, yes, but when it gets too busy they instigate the Private sessions. Some are paid for, others are staged to entice viewers to either buy their own session or pay to 'spy' on the secret goings-on.
 
Back
Top Bottom