Soldato
an Nvidia powered rocketshipWarms the cockles of my heart to hear my PC called a Rocketship.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The RT Related Games, Benchmarks, Software, Etc Thread.
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
12900k and 4090 at DF, game is a stutter fest, avoid it is the recommendation.
Caporegime
Last edited:
Soldato
It needs DLSS3.
Soldato
It's laggy as it is.
Soldato
True, Needs to do all that shader compilation stuff prior to the game, Put on the loading screen "Shaders compiling, This will take a few minutes" I don't understand why devs refuse to do it.
That’s exactly what happens in MW2 if you’ve made any real graphical changes.
Takes about 30 seconds.
Caporegime
No it doesn't.
Soldato
Last edited:
Caporegime
Get outta here with that blurry ass tripe. The whole point of a 4090 is you don't need that.It needs ALL the DLSS's !!!!!!
In other news just saw this...
According to DF, it's not just shader compilation stutter - the game is heavily CPU-bound and mostly single-threaded on PC - that's why the performance (stutters aside) is so bad. A modern CPU+GPU should have zero issues running this game at 4k 60fps and up - sadly the devs botched it.
Last edited:
'some users'In other news just saw this...
Caporegime
They should have said, 'I understand everyone bar LtMatt with a 7950X is having issues running the game.''some users'
Caporegime
I'll stop my campaign playthrough until the patch is available. However, I've already got two videos recorded and uploading to the Tubes pre-patch, still running smoothly with only the odd spike in frame time.
EDIT - Here's one of them at 4K.
This part actually hits the FPS really hard, probably a decent use case for some FSR but as FPS goes up after this part, I'd still rather use native.
EDIT - Here's one of them at 4K.
Last edited:
That framerate is terrible!I'll stop my campaign playthrough until the patch is available. However, I've already got two videos recorded and uploading to the Tubes pre-patch, still running smoothly with only the odd spike in frame time.
EDIT - Here's one of them at 4K.
This part actually hits the FPS really hard, probably a decent use case for some FSR but as FPS goes up after this part, I'd still rather use native.
Caporegime
Have you ever tried Frame Generation? Trust me, you don't want to, especially not at these FPS. Better off using FSR or the games own temporal upscaler if you can't tolerate below 50 FPS.That framerate is terrible!
Luckily, the rest of the game so far has been well above this, if you've seen my earlier videos (part 1/2) and the next one (part 4) coming soon.
On medium pre-set?
No idea abou the above by the way but usually consoles do not have as high settings.
Oh, not faulting you for playing at native - just stating that you *should* be getting a consistent 100+ fps (lows!) with that setup compared with what the PS5 is doing - how did the devs screw the pooch so badly?Have you ever tried Frame Generation? Trust me, you don't want to, especially not at these FPS. Better off using FSR or the games own temporal upscaler if you can't tolerate below 50 FPS.
Luckily, the rest of the game so far has been well above this, if you've seen my earlier videos (part 1/2) and the next one (part 4) coming soon.
- Status