Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 4,043
- Location
- Uranus
Not sure if it's worth the 100 FPS hit.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
You don't mess with perfection.Whens Frogger getting an RTX update?
No, you can also play 4K RT (4090 can do >50 fps; FG can also add more). Just not PT. In fact if you do tests of raster VS RT you will find that there is actually proportionally little difference for a 4090 due to just how heavy it is with the RT cores (all RT, lighting = medium).Basically play 4k raster or 1080p with tracer...
Does the original RT really look that bad? I've seen way better reflections from ENB mods that don't come with the insane performance hit.
RT continues being a meme.
I do appreciate RT in Diablo 2 resurrected even though I own a RX 6600. On the other hand, I don't have any other games with RT, so basing my opinion on a single instance is not exactly what I would call well informed.I'm noticing a direct correlation between dislike of RT and people who own AMD cards or NVIDIA cards that can't handle it. Funny that, it's easy not to care about something when you have no choice in the matter (other than spending an extortionate amount on a GPU).
I don't think that has ray tracing?
I've seen way better reflections from ENB mods that don't come with the insane performance hit.
Literally impossible.
It's totally possible for raster FX to have better light simulation than an actual light simulation.... Trust me bro ! /s