This is why people are losing respect for the police...

Status
Not open for further replies.
The ‘underclass’ (doesn’t exist according to some on here) pose the biggest threat where I live.
As you said chavs on (stolen) bikes.
yea because white poverty is ignored, there's no poor white people apparently, the areas get almost no investment and poor schools, so the cycle just repeats and seemingly now gets worse with every generation.

Was it Sunak who diverted funds from poor areas to tory majority voting affluent places? I'm pretty sure it was, we need a good uprising, with enough immigrants it's going to happen at some point, I should be welcoming them because without it the country will never change.

English people are too down trodden and just don't have the energy, time or money to fight for a better future.

I wish MPs were forced to live in their constituency mine lives about 20 miles away because the person doesn't want to live here clearly.
they dont have a clue what the area is like, I bet they only came here to take a photo for twitter and leave.

they don't listen to the voters anyway and they are forced to tow the party line... so it's almost like why bother voting?
 
Last edited:
Sorry but that's not plausible at all, there's no way a cyst on the brain just magically appeared the day after because of the injury

Could have been there the whole time accotrding to a quick google
Brain cysts are not truly “brain tumors” because they do not arise from the brain tissue itself. Although they tend to be benign (non-cancerous), they are sometimes found in parts of the brain that control vital functions. Many cysts are formed before birth and slowly grow over the course of years.


oops meant to edit that into my above post...
 
Last edited:
Police forces must be sick of walking on egg shells. What can they do when the media and twitter mob come after them for doing their jobs? A bit heavy handed yes but a heightened situation with officers injured, firearms involved and suspects unwilling to comply.. Perhaps they should kick heads more often in these circumstances, we might have less crime.

They can dish it out but they can’t take it.
 
Could have been there the whole time accotrding to a quick google

Yup, and that's the issue I was highlighting re: the newspaper article, it's presented without context leading people to draw thier own conclusions and for the average man in the street many might then link it to the assault.

OMG no way a cyst was found, must have been the police.

It was either there all along or something else is being mistaken for one.

Ironically even just highlighting that issue has led to two other posters on here quoting me having still drawn that flawed conclusion and sticking with it. This is why sloppy journalism/omitting important context or not asking obvious follow-up questions can be so misleading.
 
Last edited:
Yup, and that's the issue I was highlighting re: the newspaper article, it's presented without context leading people to draw thier own conclusions and for the average man in the street many might then link it to the assault.

OMG no way a cyst was found, must have been the police.

It was either there all along or something else is being mistaken for one.

Ironically even just highlighting that issue has led to two other posters on here quoting me having still drawn that flawed conclusion and sticking with it. This is why sloppy journalism/omitting important context or not asking obvious follow-up questions can be so misleading.

seems it depends what type of cyst it is though
Arachnoid cysts are the most common type of brain cyst. They are often congenital, or present at birth (primary arachnoid cysts). Head injury or trauma can also result in a secondary arachnoid cyst. The cysts are fluid-filled sacs, not tumors.

The likely cause is a split of the arachnoid membrane, one of the three layers of tissue that surround and protect the brain and spinal cord.

doesnt sound that dangerous

Arachnoid Cyst Treatment​

Arachnoid cysts — even large ones — that do not cause symptoms or put pressure on the brain or spinal cord do not require treatment.

The main goal of arachnoid cyst treatment is to drain fluid from the cyst and relieve pressure. This can be accomplished through several treatment options:

also
Arachnoid cysts are the most common type of brain cyst. They get their name from the arachnoid membrane that covers the brain and spinal cord. The cysts can occur in the brain or spinal canal. Arachnoid cysts affect approximately 3 in 100 people, but most will never know they have one because they often go undetected.


people in this thread have one and don't even know, so yea, the odds are it was already there.
 
Last edited:
Police forces must be sick of walking on egg shells. What can they do when the media and twitter mob come after them for doing their jobs? A bit heavy handed yes but a heightened situation with officers injured, firearms involved and suspects unwilling to comply.. Perhaps they should kick heads more often in these circumstances, we might have less crime.

They can dish it out but they can’t take it.

Most people would probably be quite comfortable with significant force being used by the police (including lethal firearms) to stop/subdue someone who is carrying out an attack or posing an actual live threat to others. But once the police have that person cuffed and under control, further violence does seem hard to justify. Especially if it turns out to be revenge (e.g. I kicked him in the head after cuffing him because he had just put my mate in hospital).

Even if we are talking about an actual murderer being arrested, is it really acceptable these days for them to "fall down the stairs" whilst in the back of the van on the way to custody?
 
I’d love it if the people who espouse the benefits of police brutality, face it erroneously, after being mistaken for a wrongun.

The squeals of protest and shock would be delightful music to the ears of civil rights activists who understand that the violence of the state must be controlled and held to a far higher standard than your average man on the street.

Sadly it’s unlikely, as those who sit behind their keyboards cheering horrendous state abuse very rarely touch grass.
 
I’d love it if the people who espouse the benefits of police brutality, face it erroneously, after being mistaken for a wrongun.

The squeals of protest and shock would be delightful music to the ears of civil rights activists who understand that the violence of the state must be controlled and held to a far higher standard than your average man on the street.

Sadly it’s unlikely, as those who sit behind their keyboards cheering horrendous state abuse very rarely touch grass.
Nonsense.
These strong Pakistani males are training for Jihad, and have been for years, they are more than a match for the average police officer. They also have no respect for western law, they want Sharia.
What chance does a ‘normal’ person have vs a person that’s done any form of training?
Our politically correct police force are outmatched by these strong guys.
Fire support officers were called to assist with the arrest and as I have previously said - under absolutely no circumstances can these guys risk loosing their firearm to an aggressive attacker.
The kick to the head was brutal I admit, but it was a better outcome than grappling the guy and loosing his weapon in an airport.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know what everyone else think, but this is my thought.

The situation surrounding the incident at Manchester Airport is shrouded in uncertainty.

We currently have limited information, primarily relying on the videos circulating online. While these videos are deeply disturbing, they only offer a partial perspective on the events.

It's understandable that some people will automatically defend the police, citing their official statements. However, it's crucial to approach this situation with a critical eye. Given the complex nature of the incident and the history of police misconduct, it's essential to withhold judgment until more evidence is available.

The conflicting reports abound, including claims that the men were protecting elderly women from a third party, racially charged narratives, and an assault on police officers. However, none of these claims have been verified by evidence.


The Greater Manchester Police (GMP) have also provided inconsistent statements, initially describing the event as an altercation and later upgrading it to an assault. This inconsistency, coupled with past controversies like, last weeks, racial allegation investigation of 7 officers, Hillsborough, the murder of Stephen Lawrence and much more, undermines public trust in the police's account.

1st statement - Officers were called to repots of an altercation between member of the public.
2nd statement - We were called to reports of assault.

Graphic videos circulating online depict what appears to be excessive force used by a police officer. In one instance, a firearms officer is seen kicking and stomping on a man who is already subdued on the ground, likely after being tasered. The officer then targets another individual with their hands raised, who appears to be complying with instructions. The officer kicks this individual, drags them to the ground, and strikes him with the taser. A female officer is also seen kneeing the first individual and later in another video pushing the old women that was with them. There are also indications that police officers attempted to prevent bystanders from filming the incident, including using pepper spray.
but also instances where bystanders filming the incident were themselves arrested. This raises further concerns about police conduct and potential attempts to suppress public scrutiny.

While the police have offered their explanation, their credibility is compromised by past controversies. Without concrete evidence like CCTV or bodycam footage, it's impossible to verify either side of the story. The officer's actions, especially given their role as a firearms officer, are deeply concerning and raise serious questions about police conduct, accountability, and training. The apparent inaction of other officers present at the scene is equally alarming.

It's important to remember that the actions of a few officers shouldn't tarnish the reputation of the entire police force. However, this incident highlights systemic issues within law enforcement that require urgent attention.



It's deeply concerning that this incident is being used as a platform for racist narratives, it's being exploited to promote racist views. The focus should remain on the issue. some people are making it too obvious to everyone of their views.
 
Last edited:
I'll say it again, those officer all looked properly agitated. More has happened that we haven't seen. This isn't the US, the UK police don't go from zero to stormtrooper at the drop of the hat. We see police officers keep their cool in intimidating circumstances daily nowadays, and in that video we saw at least 2 of the male officers very much having lost their cool. More has happened it just has been seen publically yet.
 
I've worn a uniform and used force before, sometimes excessive force, we're trained very well how to react to it and what to do with controlled aggression. Kicking someone in the face and stamping on their head when they are lying on the floor wasn't in the manual, never taught and clearly just wrong. It would have seen me face some serious disciplinary measures, justifiably and probably sacked with a possible Police arrest.

I've seen colleagues cut, stabbed, spat on, have their noses and jaws broken, male & female; still doesn't mean you can kick someone in the face & stamp on their head. I think the officer clearly lost all composure and as a Police Officer trained in Control & Restraint should be held to a much higher standard.

Messy situation for all involved and clearly a whole lot we don't know; I'd still be shocked if his use of excessive force was justified at the end of it.
 
The BBC's rundown of the video is pretty interesting: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/videos/cn05p53qw9zo

I never saw the guy sat on the bench: he's sat there with his hands in the air - the officer approaches him, tells him to get on the ground - as the man complies, the officer kicks him really hard in the thigh then whacks him on the back of the head with the taser..

None of it looks good.
 
I'm talking about a cyst on the brain, you seem to be conflating that with "injury".

No one said his brain couldn't be injured, what is sus is the idea the cyst they're referring to magically appeared in a few hours. He could have developed a hematoma - a collection of blood or perhaps had some swelling but a cyst takes time.

What are you basing this on though?

'A brain cyst or cystic brain lesion is a fluid-filled sac in the brain.'

It sounds pretty likely such water build up could happen as a result of injury

EDIT: Many cysts are formed before birth and slowly grow over the course of years. Some arise as a result of head injury or infection. There are five main types of cysts found in the brain: Arachnoid, Colloid, Dermoid, Epidermoid, and Pineal.

The time it takes for a cyst to form depends on the type of cyst:

  • Ganglion cysts: Can appear suddenly and grow quickly
 
Last edited:
Crazy.
I would expect only one outcome from assaulting a police officer at an airport, but here the human rights of the attacker are more important, Try it in another country, like Spain.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nonsense.
These strong Pakistani males are training for Jihad, and have been for years, they are more than a match for the average police officer.

The average jihadi male in the UK is borderline developmentally disabled. I get that you yourself are terrified of them and wouldn’t stand a chance in a conflict situation with a small skinny Asian child but please don’t project your own personal fear onto anyone else.
Our politically correct police force are outmatched by these strong guys.
Fire support officers were called to assist with the arrest and as I have previously said - under absolutely no circumstances can these guys risk loosing their firearm to an aggressive attacker.
The kick to the head was brutal I admit, but it was a better outcome than grappling the guy and loosing his weapon in an airport.

Politically correct yet racist police force? Get the story straight.

Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about. Firearms officers were not requested, they just happened to be near.

Whilst I agree a kick to the head is better than grappling whilst holding a gun, neither was necessary, so it’s not a real choice between the two is it.

And source that these skinny fats were “training for jihad”. If you think they look like someone’s who is “trained” you must be absolutely frail.
 
The average jihadi male in the UK is borderline developmentally disabled. I get that you yourself are terrified of them and wouldn’t stand a chance in a conflict situation with a small skinny Asian child but please don’t project your own personal fear onto anyone else

And source that these skinny fats were “training for jihad”. If you think they look like someone’s who is “trained” you must be absolutely frail.
Yes, ‘frail’ like these guys that overpowered 3 standard airport police officers requiring armed backup to be called.
You go assault a police officer in any EU country that has armed officers, at an airport.
You probably won’t be around to tell your story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom