Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff

[cainer]

Cool idea, his signature still sucks though. Looks nothing like his name

Interesting how the date is scribbled out and edited. Simple mistake or pre-typed statement from a few days ago, edited just before release once the jury came back?

Says UK under it so maybe they changed the day/month around

 

[Minusorange]

Who won custody of the bee?

Nobody because it was stepped on by the dog and died *insert pain face*

 

[Dogoid]

i fell asleep , and woken to the news. brilliant

 

[Hades]

Depp's statement was actually written on a typewriter, how cool is that? Photo of the setup released:

Had to google it but "veritas numquam perit" means "truth never perishes". Nice.

 

[GreatAuk]

Seems like a fair result! And hopefully will open some more doors for more men to talk about their experiences of abuse too.

Still, the grifters aren't happy...

https://twitter.com/x/status/1532082339618164739

Don't understand how anyone could hear even a small amount of what was presented at the trial and come away unreservedly on Amber's side. I think "Full-time feminist revolutionary. Part-time Cambridge academic and barrister" probably explains it

The ironic name made me think she was a parody account at first but I don't think she is.

 

[ZG002]

Cool idea, his signature still sucks though. Looks nothing like his name

Interesting how the date is scribbled out and edited. Simple mistake or pre-typed statement from a few days ago, edited just before release once the jury came back?

I don't think it is, it's just how the zero's are written with a line through them.

 

[el_dazza]

Fantastic result. What a vile woman she is.

 

[Dogoid]

the only work she will get now is at Chick-Fil-A

​

​

 

[darael]

I suspected that Depp was confident that he would win the case when he came to the UK to do his concert.

I'm glad justice has been served to Depp, but I'm also equally glad that this is all now over.

 

[Dogoid]

I need a new trial to watch now

 

[kindai]

If you want to find something to laugh at, head to twitter and how the woke feminists are losing their minds

 

[Dogoid]

Absolutely not

 

[Scougar]

the only work she will get now is at Chick-Fil-A

​

​

They actually have standards.

 

[Rainmaker]

I need a new trial to watch now

She'll appeal. I wonder if JD will sue again based on her repeating the defamatory allegations on Instagram less than an hour after the ruling? I almost hope he does. What a dangerous, twisted woman.

 

[roddypoddy]

Must have been more than gruelling for the jury, having to sit through all of that, well done them.

 

[dowie]

It's bizarre, people talking about how this is supposedly setting "women" back etc.. but since when does she represent all women?

The outrage from people is the result of the rather silly positions taken in recent years like "believe all women", supposedly this undoes the work of #MeToo???? But it doesn't, at best it just serves as a very public example of why a generalisation like "believe all women" is clearly flawed.

Officially the rallying cry is just "believe women", but the "all" has often been added and/or implied, it's not "believe women more often"... like other catchy phrases it is supposed to be a bit controversial; "black lives matter" not "black lives matter too", "defund the police" not "reform the police" or "allocate more funding to social services too" etc..

 

[mrk]

It's bizarre, people talking about how this is supposedly setting "women" back etc.. but since when does she represent all women?

The outrage from people is the result of the rather silly positions taken in recent years like "believe all women", supposedly this undoes the work of #MeToo???? But it doesn't, at best it just serves as a very public example of why a generalisation like "believe all women" is clearly flawed.

It's because these people are hardcore feminists and the guys siding with heard are just manlets.

This outcome has undone nothing for MeToo etc, it has actually boosted it because MeToo now has additional relevance for men who experience DV.

 

[Dogoid]

Anyway, here's Wonderwall

 

[Rainmaker]

It's bizarre, people talking about how this is supposedly setting "women" back etc.. but since when does she represent all women?

The outrage from people is the result of the rather silly positions taken in recent years like "believe all women", supposedly this undoes the work of #MeToo???? But it doesn't, at best it just serves as a very public example of why a generalisation like "believe all women" is clearly flawed.

Indeed. It's a blow to liars, and those who would twist the judicial system as a weapon against their victims. It's nothing to do with real abused people, or if it is it's only inasmuch as it supports the fact that the truth will out. It's hard to argue that JD wasn't the victim here, and he prevailed. That's only a problem for some in that he isn't a woman...

 

[.:MBK:.]

It's bizarre, people talking about how this is supposedly setting "women" back etc.. but since when does she represent all women?

They really should (imo) take this as a good thing. Those who abuse these movements for personal gain are often the ones that derail them. Removing Amber from this should be taken as a positive to such movements, not a negative.

Genuine claims should be treated as such, but anyone muddying the waters with weak/baseless acusations makes it harder for the judiciary system to do its job