Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    361
  • Poll closed .
It has got to the point where now it is just absolutely laughable. So I will do nothing but just laugh at the continued lies and laugh at the people who somehow seem to be supporting or giving some weight to those lies as if by magic miracle they might be true (spoiler alert, they won't ever be true). These people will never ever see otherwise.
 
It has got to the point where now it is just absolutely laughable. So I will do nothing but just laugh at the continued lies and laugh at the people who somehow seem to be supporting or giving some weight to those lies as if by magic miracle they might be true (spoiler alert, they won't ever be true). These people will never ever see otherwise.

Its baffling how people can believe her given her utterly farsical performance on the stand, let alone the amount of lies she got caught up in, as well as her interpretations of pledging vs actually donating.
 
Its baffling how people can believe her given her utterly farsical performance on the stand, let alone the amount of lies she got caught up in, as well as her interpretations of pledging vs actually donating.
I suspect many of them didn't actually watch the trial.
 
He runs an istandwithamber company as he/they expressly said they would be releasing a report detailing the bots attacking her and her alone, nothing at all was mentioned about the otherside of the battle.
What "other side of the battle"? Is Jonny getting attacked at the same scale by Twitter bots as well? :confused:

You guys are so deep in the rabbit hole you can't even see it yourself.
 
How about the 6 years of abuse he endured before the trial and verdict of not liable was found, when the evidence that was supressed in the UK trial was finally released to the public, what about the continued abuse he receives on social media by those are choose to ignore the verdict and still continue to defame him.

The scale of said attacks is irrelevant, he is still being attacked just as she is.

If you think those who side with Depp and the truth are deep in a rabbit hole, then god knows where those who think AH is somehow a victim in this. Certainly a few sandwiches short of a picnic basket for sure.
 
Latest interview where she claims to have released a "binder" of evidence, which includes the transcripts from here doctors sessions where she details all the abuse over years. Complains that it wasn't allowed in the trial.

That's because its hearsay. It's literally what you told someone else, and going on your track record for telling lies. No one would believe a word you say in it.
I know and it beggars belief!!

She says that the notes prove she was abused by him. However, she doesn't seem to realise that the notes prove that she told the therapist that she was abused.

It is absolutely not the same thing.

A therapist has to listen to what is being told but they don't have to believe it. And as it is easy to lie to a therapist as it isn't their job to investigate the truth of the story.

Hence why it can't be used in trials.
 
I know and it beggars belief!!

She says that the notes prove she was abused by him. However, she doesn't seem to realise that the notes prove that she told the therapist that she was abused.

It is absolutely not the same thing.

A therapist has to listen to what is being told but they don't have to believe it. And as it is easy to lie to a therapist as it isn't their job to investigate the truth of the story.

Hence why it can't be used in trials.

They can use therapist notes in a trial, the therapist in question would need to be on the stand where they can be cross examined, either live or via deposition. They never asked this therapist to testify for reasons only they know.
 
They can use therapist notes in a trial, the therapist in question would need to be on the stand where they can be cross examined, either live or via deposition. They never asked this therapist to testify for reasons only they know.
If they presented the therapist notes in the trial then they would have to submit them in their entirety. They would not be able to pick and choose some notes and not others. That would mean that Depp's team could cross examine on the rest of the contents. So I'm guessing that Heard's team chose not to present them as they felt overall the contents would not be in her favour, even if one or two statements may have helped her.
 
How about the 6 years of abuse he endured before the trial and verdict of not liable was found, when the evidence that was supressed in the UK trial was finally released to the public, what about the continued abuse he receives on social media by those are choose to ignore the verdict and still continue to defame him.

The scale of said attacks is irrelevant, he is still being attacked just as she is.
Why would a Twitter bot person answer this question? :confused:

If you think those who side with Depp and the truth are deep in a rabbit hole, then god knows where those who think AH is somehow a victim in this. Certainly a few sandwiches short of a picnic basket for sure.
The lack of grace and wisdom displayed by the most vocal Depp supporters is enough to put people off engaging entirely.
 
Why would they publically announce they are going to investigate/report on one thing and not another?
He is a dude that specialises in hunting Twitter trolls/bots; Amber Heard has a huge amount of Twitter trolls. It isn't rocket science. He isn't "picking a side"; he is simply following the mass of Twitter trolls/bots.
 
He is a dude that specialises in hunting Twitter trolls/bots; Amber Heard has a huge amount of Twitter trolls. It isn't rocket science. He isn't "picking a side"; he is simply following the mass of Twitter trolls/bots.

She certainly does, and entirely justified. All I'm saying is that Depp also has his fair share of twitter trolls and bots, its not only her. Everyone is just focused on her because of the absurdity of her claims that she continues to say even after being found liable for defamation.
 
Back
Top Bottom