Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    361
  • Poll closed .
I think it’s crystal clear that the point of “believe women” is to take their accusation at face value.

Yes, it is.

Which means summary conviction of any man accused by any woman, obviously. No trial. No investigation at all. Any investigation means not taking the accusation at face value, i.e. any investigation goes directly against the whole point of the ideology which is, as you say, crystal clear.

How would you deal with two women contradicting each other? You can't rely on simple sexism (woman good, man bad) to decide who is telling the truth and who is lying. So what would you do?
 
Fighting historic prejudices with modern day prejudices doesn't rid the world of prejudice. It does the exact opposite and perpetuates it. We have to learn to treat everyone equally regardless of race and gender.

This is exactly why so many people followed the Depp/Heard case when it became clear that he had been wronged by societal prejudices against men, and cheered when a jury found in his favour. That prejudice against men had been fanned by the #believeallwomen movement.
100% this. Imagine claiming you want to break down prejudice by yourself being racially prejudiced and sexually prejudiced. Complete and utter moron.

You don’t fight hate with hate. It doesn’t work.
 
Latest interview where she claims to have released a "binder" of evidence, which includes the transcripts from here doctors sessions where she details all the abuse over years. Complains that it wasn't allowed in the trial.

That's because its hearsay. It's literally what you told someone else, and going on your track record for telling lies. No one would believe a word you say in it.
 
How would you deal with two women contradicting each other? You can't rely on simple sexism (woman good, man bad) to decide who is telling the truth and who is lying. So what would you do?

I'd determine guilt by butch levels. If one or both aren't butch and fairly attractive and bi, I'd judge based more on the one who is likelier to date me if I side with them. Just tellin it like it is.
 
Last edited:
I love the way she goes to put her head in her hands as an involuntary reaction, but then recovers and pretends to wipe her face.
if you watch this kind of click bait (these memes of pictures of expressions on her face are tiring) ... you can see why Depp who has a better acting pedigree can effectively defend himself, did the prosecution actually try and utilise his occupation as a justification to question credibility of what he said.
( ... an actor on the stand has to be a special situation - have other actors been televised on the stand )

Ronaldo (case came up again last weeks) perhaps didn't feel confident is his credibility as a defendant when he payed off his accuser


That's because its hearsay.
what's new - many of domestic abuse cases do come down to he says, she says and the credibility of both reports in the eyes of the jury.
 
It is largely he said/she said when it comes to most DV cases, and credibility goes a long way. AH has none. So even if it did happen no one is going to believe her now.

Boy who cried wolf etc etc.

It's why Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, "false in one thing, false in everything." is used in legal circles/law.
 


Revelation Amber Heard didn’t donate $7m divorce settlement was a ‘fiasco’ says trial juror​


An anonymous Johnny Depp trial juror has said that the revelation that Amber Heard didn’t donate her $7m divorce settlement was “a fiasco for her”.
articulate jurors
 
if you watch this kind of click bait (these memes of pictures of expressions on her face are tiring) ... you can see why Depp who has a better acting pedigree can effectively defend himself, did the prosecution actually try and utilise his occupation as a justification to question credibility of what he said.
( ... an actor on the stand has to be a special situation - have other actors been televised on the stand )

Ronaldo (case came up again last weeks) perhaps didn't feel confident is his credibility as a defendant when he payed off his accuser



what's new - many of domestic abuse cases do come down to he says, she says and the credibility of both reports in the eyes of the jury.
lol "clickbait". it's video testimony. she tried to be oh-so-clever and stuck her foot in her dumb mouth, as she always does.
 
Latest interview where she claims to have released a "binder" of evidence, which includes the transcripts from here doctors sessions where she details all the abuse over years. Complains that it wasn't allowed in the trial.

That's because its hearsay. It's literally what you told someone else, and going on your track record for telling lies. No one would believe a word you say in it.
apparently the writing in the notes is suspiciously very similar to her own, lol.
 
No surprised there @wolfie138, she claims it to be evidence of abuse, and while the binder could never be submitted on hearsay grounds, they could have called the therapist to the stand and had them testify under oath where the hearsay rule wouldn't apply.

They of course didn't do that. AH is just digging herself a deeper hole, it's either going to end in her complete humiliation or in serious trouble.
 
Dr Curry hit the nail on the head w/ her assessment. Turd just won't stop flapping her gums until she's in jail for contempt, perjury and/or anything else they get her for. she just HAS to have the final word and each time she tries she does more damage to herself than Johnny's team ever could. she's back to baiting him again, trying to get him to do an interview. the fact she's blabbing all this ridiculous nonsense and he's just ignoring her is absolutely killing her.
 
Back
Top Bottom