Yep. I read that too last night via a tweet. I need to get of twitter, I raged so hard reading that. Surprisingly, not much of this has been splattered across my FB feed over the last few weeks. Maybe I have finally set my FB settings correct and have the right people I connect with. I dread to think what would have been posted if I didn't change my settings and block people.
With Amber mentioning Kate Moss, it opens doors to JD team allowing them to bring in Ambers abuse on her ex.Ben Chew looks happy.
There's no actual bias from the BBC, they're reporting this in the same style/context as every other UK traditional media outlet. The fact that you feel you can't ignore the BBC is a completely separate issue altogether.
Yes it was gross that Heard was made out as some kind of hero for surviving abuse when it currently looks like she may have made the whole thing up.
That's the American press for you, everyone has to take side no matter how much of plonker it makes you look. Just look CNN and MSNBC during the Rittenhouse trail, that boy was guilty from day one according to them and 'experts' they gave time to on their platforms.
Yes indeed as stated those other traditional media outlets are optional paid for services not forced by law services such as the BBC. That is the issue that you seem to miss in the difference in why people get frustrated. Also never noted that I didn't think the other media outlets were also badly reported but I am not forced to fund them.
X-D
![[FnG]magnolia](/styles/overclockers/avatars/9.png){kind=avatar}
Not today, 16th May next day in court.Heards testimony yesterday was comical, her strategy seems to be to try and string out a story and get more and more "upset" when telling it to give the tears time to appear, unfortunately for her they never did.
All she managed yesterday was to pull some faces that made her look constipated more so than upset.
She'll probably have a small water pistol concealed on her person today to give the illusion of tears.
In one.
