Sub to Sub hunting is a very slow, patient long drawn out process that takes place over many, many hours if not days. It takes a very coordinated crew monitoring from multiple positions within it's operational area. A former submariner that I have known for many years used to describe hunting exercises as "boring as ****"Okay, so why would they not disclose.
Also how do other subs hunt other subs if they require multiple sources to triangulate?
Wolfpack's? ....
The people inside are kept safe by the pressure inside the vessel countering the pressure around it.
But if there was a rupture to the structure the pressure outside would be much greater, compressing the vessel
Very basic but yea..that seems right.This statement on the BBC site seems wrong, is it?
This statement on the BBC site seems wrong, is it?
I'm not an expert so I could be wrong. But that statement can't be true. If the pressure inside was equal to the pressure outside then it would crush the occupants. There also wouldn't be an implosion when the hull gave way.Very basic but yea..that seems right.
So the CEO ignored safety concerns,(he fired a guy that raised concerns), donated to the GOP but didn't want to hire experienced white men....Probably because anyone experienced would raised safety concerns....
Yikes, at least they wouldn't have felt anything, would have been over instantly.
I was hoping one of them would be found and rescued, would've made for a better film in a few years time.
Nah, it would have been leaking first then the inevitable crush. Would have defiantly been a few moments of Oooo ****
towed arrays, and as themightyten says it's normally a very slow tedious process as the hunting sub doesn't want to give away that it's there, but at the same time neither does the hunted one so the hunter will be searching for anything and then moving (very very quietly) to try and get additional directional indications once they've had the first.Can't subs tow a sonar so they could triangulate, or even just from front/rear & ... maybe they did contact oceangate about the noise
Nah, it would have been leaking first then the inevitable crush. Would have defiantly been a few moments of Oooo ****
Nopeski.Nah, it would have been leaking first then the inevitable crush. Would have defiantly been a few moments of Oooo ****
I'm pretty sure that isnt correct at all. The pressures involved with something that deep are enormous. its like 2490KG of force pushing in all directions.Nah, it would have been leaking first then the inevitable crush. Would have defiantly been a few moments of Oooo ****
Define "it would have been leaking first" in this scenario?
I'm pretty sure that isnt correct at all. The pressures involved with something that deep are enormous. its like 2490KG of force pushing in all directions.
Given the amateur nature of the build, this is the most probable outcome.it just immediately imploded without them knowing they had any issue.
You are right. Hoop compression around the hull and the hemispherical ends resist the pressure externally.I'm not an expert so I could be wrong. But that statement can't be true. If the pressure inside was equal to the pressure outside then it would crush the occupants. There also wouldn't be an implosion when the hull gave way.
Instead I think it must be the strength of the hull itself which resists the water pressure. The air inside must be at approximately one atmospheric pressure and the pressure outside is hundreds of times greater.