Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 1,349
As I thought the end bells are intact and the carbon fibre hull imploded because it wasn't up to the job.
There was a bell end inside it too by all accounts.
As I thought the end bells are intact and the carbon fibre hull imploded because it wasn't up to the job.
The whole thing seems like a clown show to me, I don't think they could have been saved but it makes you wonder about the state of the vessel.
Yeah that would have cost money.Wouldn't been able to save when blown to pieces in milliseconds
Could have been saved if maybe they got certification for the thing to do this in the place?
its been down to the titanic 3 times before and remained intact
you cant just say "clearly wasnt up to the job"
There are safety standards.I understand this is tragic and it will affect sub trips like this is years to come, but I do hope from this at least lessons will be learnt. maybe the international comunity will now start putting some kind of minimum safety standards on all subs. At least this is something that should hopefully not happen again.
its been down to the titanic 3 times before and remained intact
you cant just say "clearly wasnt up to the job"
I thought The concept of carbon fibre composite was that Carbon Fiber is excellent for tensile properties, but not great for compressive forces, and vice-versa for resins, hence carbon fibre composites that are excellent for both..Opposite direction, those are stretching the carbon making the most of its tensile strength properties.
Pretty much it’s a submersible de Haviland comet in my view.
He must have conned them all or they were incredibly naive and didn't check what they were getting themselves into.
Opposite direction, those are stretching the carbon making the most of its tensile strength properties.
Pretty much it’s a submersible de Haviland comet in my view.
Pretty much vaporisedWhat would happen to the bodies once imploded? How 'small' the bodies would be in that depth?
Fish food smallWhat would happen to the bodies once imploded? How 'small' the bodies would be in that depth?
From Implosion or water pressure?Pretty much vaporised
Yeah, I see both sides. applying normal regulated industry mindsets to experimental stuff like this trying to make something economically viable for extreme tourism is going to boil your blood...The French guy had been down before and was a deep sea diving expert. Hamish is described as a pilot, skydiver, astronaut.
We get it, you don't do risk or understand doing dangerous things for the thrill
Look at the people who die base jumping or those extreme selfies. They're adrenaline junkies and it wouldn't be such a thrill if it wasn't dangerous.
It is a cylinder with 2 titanium end caps bonded to either end.. The rear fairing houses the external unpressurised components and made to look 'sleek'..It looks like it was not a pure cylinder with that particular rear fairing. Also connection details between the components would be critical. Combinations of axial and circumferential compression and possibly local tensile stresses are relevant for buckling failure as well as repeat loading cycles.
But if you've got a choice between a parachute that's certified or one that's only been tried a few times and has no design certification *at all*... Just because you're a thrill seeker doesn't mean you don't try to maximise your chances of staying alive...The French guy had been down before and was a deep sea diving expert. Hamish is described as a pilot, skydiver, astronaut.
We get it, you don't do risk or understand doing dangerous things for the thrill
Look at the people who die base jumping or those extreme selfies. They're adrenaline junkies and it wouldn't be such a thrill if it wasn't dangerous.
That's how fatigue works though. Its imploded so clearly wasnt up to the job.its been down to the titanic 3 times before and remained intact
you cant just say "clearly wasnt up to the job"
It looks like it was not a pure cylinder with that particular rear fairing. Also connection details between the components would be critical. Combinations of axial and circumferential compression and possibly local tensile stresses are relevant for buckling failure as well as repeat loading cycles.
Sad. The video I just saw about the CEO loving the way the acrylic screen crackles at depth… just screams fatigue failure to me. Ie change every dive. The collapse at that pressure could be over in 30ms and temperature as hot as the sun.
The carbon fibre surely is insulation too, no pressure vessel with the pressure hogher outside would rely on that. Carbon needs to be in tension . Filament wound fuselage like a 787 Dreamliner is for pressure inside. With outside pressure the forces are compressive so only really as strong as the plastic compound binding the fibres.