Associate
- Joined
- 14 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 598
That pricing makes no sense at all, even with tax Nvidia or suppliers have nailed on another £250ish for a laugh
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
They are just... ludicrous!
First we thought a 500 quid card was OOT. Now this, I mean for 2399.99 you can get quite an amazing system itself.
Surely only for those with more money than sense.
http://www.overclock.net/t/1492294/ds-nvidia-gtx-titan-z-review-benchmarks/90#post_22331631Exactly. If the Xbox One's initial presentation could be summed up as 'Watch TV, TV, TV', Nvidia's Titan-Z presentation certainly is 'Gaming, gaming, gaming', and that is mind boggling. And I say that because they had the last month whilst the card was delayed to fix their PR message, yet they didn't.
And here we are, the Titan-Z has launched, with a presentation video full of "gaming", but they didn't sample the card to any major tech media outlet for review. No Anand, TR, TechPowerUP, HardOCP, Tom's, Guru3D, PC Perspektive, Hardware Canucks, etc.
http://techreport.com/news/26520/nvidia-geforce-titan-z-is-selling-online-for-3-000
http://www.guru3d.com/news_story/msi_geforce_gtx_titan_z_launches_kinda.html
But this is the most baffling one:
http://www.pcper.com/news/Graphics-Cards/NVIDIA-Finally-Launches-GeForce-GTX-Titan-Z-Graphics-Card
So, we basically get to know that Nvidia doesn't really want to market this card to gamers, as is apparent by their actions, but they say exactly the opposite in their presentation. One thing is for certain, they don't want the card to be thoroughly reviewed, and that is a shame.
I hope one or two sites will find a way to get one or possibly fork out the money for one and do a review.
Also, what exactly did they spend the last month doing ? Improving 4K performance ? Does anybody know ?
£2,400 quid!
Sooo no reviews ?
"Let's see how many we can flog before the reviews hit the web"
Nvidia never sent the Titan Black to mainstream review sites either saying it wasn't a gaming card, as this card is two of them it makes sense they are taking the same approach.
GeForce GTX TITAN and GeForce GTX TITAN Black stormed the industry by offering supercomputer class performance to enthusiast gamers, for the most demanding titles. On the desktop, they delivered unmatched gaming performance on 3840x2160 “4K” screens, whilst remaining cool and quiet with industry-leading power efficiency.
Not a gaming card? Oddly enough it uses their gaming brand "GeForce", it's been demo'd running games, has an sli connecter for those insane enough to buy 2 for more gaming performance.
Even their own site has a lengthy waffle on it being a gaming gpu
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/introducing-nvidia-geforce-gtx-titan-z
Think NVidia need to wind their necks in a bit, its undoubtedly a gaming card regardless of what way they try and spin it.
And here's their new video on it, "built for gamers with the most extreme pc rigs".
Not a gaming card? Oddly enough it uses their gaming brand "GeForce", it's been demo'd running games, has an sli connecter for those insane enough to buy 2 for more gaming performance.
For enthusiast small form factor systems, like GeForce GTX Battleboxes, the GTX TITAN Z is the only game in town, delivering unbeatable gaming performance for chassis that lack the required room for standard SLI configurations. If you’re looking for your own performance powerhouse, like a Battlebox, hold fast: we’re working with our partners to refresh the Battlebox program with custom-made chassis are perfect for GTX TITAN Z. For further details stay locked to GeForce.com in the coming weeks.
For researchers scientists and CUDA developers, GeForce GTX TITAN Z delivers unprecedented computational power in an ATX-compatible form factor, at a fraction of the cost of a traditional supercomputer.