Was/Were is more aptIf she's searching for a pronoun, perhaps child killer would do.
You’ve usually got a combination of State, County and Town law enforcement mixed together at larger incidents who other have different comms and procedures.Something I find interesting watching law enforcement body cam in the US, probably similar in other countries as well but I think more extreme in the US. They used to be very uncoordinated, these days you have a smattering of officers with very high situational awareness and coordination skills but struggle with getting the message through, and must find it frustrating, with too many others who just don't listen/chaos as to who is in command, etc.
Same with the ASP guys when dealing with local PD at a scene - some exceptions aside they really know what they are doing but they really have to be pushy to make sure everyone is following safe procedures, etc.
Who sets the narrative? One can be deemed a freedom fighter whilst also a terrorist.It's only terrorism if it's done due to political, religious or other ideology. Random nutcase shooting up a school doesn't fall under that
Who sets the narrative? One can be deemed a freedom fighter whilst also a terrorist.
Obviously there was some messed up ideology that made this person into a terrorist.
The problem is that anything meaningful needs to be bipartisan and pass both houses.looks really weak when the leader of the usa talks about guns being a problem but can't/won't actually do anything about it.
don't wanna hear from a usa president on guns again until it's announcing a ban.
The problem is he can't, he can do small things but anything serious and that won't immediately be overturned or challenged in court requires cooperation and the Republican party in the US have made it their aim over the last 20+ years to actively oppose anything the Democrats suggest, even when it'll help the Republican voters (and the Republicans then claim credit for things like infrastructure spending they oppose, when the new bridge is built in their area).yep that's why it's so pathetic, until someone, such as a president, does something about it.
You realise its doesn't work like that right? Obviously not.looks really weak when the leader of the usa talks about guns being a problem but can't/won't actually do anything about it.
don't wanna hear from a usa president on guns again until it's announcing a ban.
I know it currently doesn't, which is why this situation continues.You realise its doesn't work like that right? Obviously not.
Making the school a gun free zone didn't exactly protect anyone did it...
If I was a teacher I'd want to be able to protect myself. Rather than be a sitting duck for whatever lunatic turns up with the gun.
Give the teachers access to guns, secure safe only they have access to, at least if they hear gun fire they can prepare rather wait to get shot.
Ideally a ban would be the best option but that's not going to happen.
no sensible options apart from a gun safe in every classroom....Making the school a gun free zone didn't exactly protect anyone did it...
If I was a teacher I'd want to be able to protect myself. Rather than be a sitting duck for whatever lunatic turns up with the gun.
Give the teachers access to guns, secure safe only they have access to, at least if they hear gun fire they can prepare rather wait to get shot.
Ideally a ban would be the best option but that's not going to happen.