Commissario
Ah the joys of completely misunderstanding basic statistics.Poverty is an insufficient explanation for varying rates of crime rates in the US...
The claim is often made that blacks commit more crime either because they are poor or because of some legacy of suffering from slavery and segregation.
Neither of these make any sense when examined more closely.
There are nearly three times as many whites living in poverty in the US than blacks as an absolute number (the percentage for blacks as group is about double that of whites but there are far fewer blacks overall than whites).
From 2018 figures there were around 25, 295,122 White Americans living in poverty (as defined by the federal governments poverty threshold)
vs 9,148691 blacks living in poverty
https://www.povertyusa.org/facts
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/IPE120218
So if poverty was the main issue then the poor whites should be massively inflating the rate of overall violent crimes for whites vs the smaller number of blacks living in poverty in the US.
If a legacy of oppression was the cause of crime then we could expect one of the most consistently systemically oppressed groups in all of history (the Jews) to top the per capita rates for violent crime but we don't see this.
Instead we see them and other minority groups who often entered the US poor like Koreans and Indians not only surpassing blacks in many metrics (including not being arrested or incarcerated) but also significantly beating the white majority in many cases.
You yourself say about poverty that the percentage of blacks living in poverty is about double that of whites...
Also it's like the old picture of statistical analysis of how bombers should have extra protection added in WW2, based on the ones that made it back. They had a lot of damage, but oddly not much around the vital areas such as engines, at least on the ones that made it back to be used in the study...
A much higher rate of black people in poverty will be living in quite close quarters, usually in a relatively small number of cities, whilst a lot of the white people living in similar levels of poverty are very spread out and in many cases may be in poverty but with opportunities to do things like get food from somewhere other than a shop (if you're in poverty somewhere with woods/wildlife you can get food from "the wilds", if you're in a similar level of poverty in a city you've not got that). You can also be "in poverty" in a rural area but still have access to quite a lot of the most basic stuff like food, which will often be considerably cheaper than in a city for the real basics.