So the coward shot himself. On to the next one then I suppose. Same time next week?
NoStrange it's never called terrorism eh.?
Strange it's never called terrorism eh.?
Strange it's never called terrorism eh.?
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
I laughed too hard at thisSo the coward shot himself. On to the next one then I suppose. Same time next week?
Strange it's never called terrorism eh.?
The end result is the same.Knives can kill people, hammers can kill people, and you can kill people with your bare hands, but its not the same as a gun, anyone who suggests that they are even vaguely the same is either stupid, ignorant or just trolling.
You do know that knives and also those items banned in the UK have been killing people for 100's if not 1000's of years before guns came along. To think of those items banned in the UK as only kitchen utensils is laughable.A knife is ostensibly a kitchen utensil used in the preparation of food that can also be used to kill somebody, in the same way an axe is a tool to chop wood that can be used to kill people etc.
At least someone gets the point.Depends what your underlying motivation and thresholds are. Ultimately the reasoning should be about saving lives.
Thank you for agreeing with me.Blades less than 3 inches or if you have a lawful reason for carrying it.
If you’re caught in public with a 3+ inch blade and you don’t have a lawful reason for carrying it (e.g. you’re a carpet fitter on your way between jobs), it’s an automatic jail sentence.
so is it most likely it was the person that did the killing and not the gun? Do you think that has a zombie knife has good intentions?What on earth has a belief in a god got to do with anything except obfuscation? What we are talking about is a person that spent two weeks in a mental health facility, had made death threats and was "hearing voices".
Would be a great argument if the gunsexuals weren't arguing that there shouldn't be any restrictions whatsoever on ownership of guns as apparently it's completely rational for people with paranoid delusions to have machines whose sole purpose is to kill people as efficiently as possible.so is it most likely it was the person that did the killing and not the gun? Do you think that has a zombie knife has good intentions?
Apologies if English isn't your first language but that reads like gibberish to me.so is it most likely it was the person that did the killing and not the gun? Do you think that has a zombie knife has good intention?
Sadly, not a joke.I laughed too hard at this