I was thinking that the opening section about the Mach10 jet felt a bit unfinished,
We do see some of his crew later, particularly the crew chief, but yes, I agree. I suppose it's a cunning plan to sell the film twice.
I was thinking that the opening section about the Mach10 jet felt a bit unfinished,
I was thinking that the opening section about the Mach10 jet felt a bit unfinished, it was a vehicle to show what Maverick is like these days, but it kind of felt like there was some sort of subplot that never got fully uncovered there, whether that was later use of the jet, keeping his crew together for some other purpose, or whatever.
I have fond memories of the original, and the first 5 minutes alone had me grinning from ear to ear.Going Saturday. I like what I'm reading
Are you 8 years old or somethingHaven't watched the original, guess I'll give a shot at some point.
should have or should have? Maybe should've?No way was this better than the original, 7/10 tops, was ok not 9/10 like the paid reviews floating about, should have been a 3 hour movie good but not great.
Just seen it in Imax, well worth it just to listen and see the jets flying around on that size screen, you can clearly see it was shot for real in jets, few times where the actors straps came loose and they flew around the cockpit slightly and pulling G force in their faces.
At least they didn't butcher the soundtrack by trying to do a modern twist and left it pretty much as it was.
They did well with the Val Kilmer scenes and it didn't feel out of place, is it as good as the original not quite but it's good in it's own right and seeing a film use mainly practical effects instead of using CGI all the way through really made this feel like a breath of fresh air.