But you’re not? You can easily tell them you don’t need one as you only watch streaming shows, not live TV?Yeah being forced to pay the TV License is a bit of scam.
But you’re not? You can easily tell them you don’t need one as you only watch streaming shows, not live TV?
Many times. If you don’t watch live TV or use BBC IPlayer you don’t need a licence. If you do, you do. It’s very simple.How many times have we been round in circles on this topic?
I do watch live TV.But you’re not? You can easily tell them you don’t need one as you only watch streaming shows, not live TV?
If you don’t watch live TV or use BBC IPlayer you don’t need a licence.
Many times. If you don’t watch live TV or use BBC IPlayer you don’t need a licence. If you do, you do. It’s very simple.
Why should we need a license to watch non-BBC content in 2020?
If the other channels got a cut of the licence for their live content then fair enough.
Part of the fee also contributes towards Freeview and Freesat, and towards the UK broadband rollout, funding local TV channels and S4C, the Welsh language TV channel, as agreed with the government as part of the 2010 licence fee settlement
There's still a huge amount of crap for which the BBC uses our money.Did not know that.
If TV licensing were more overt about these facts then maybe some would not be so anti-tv livense.
There's still a huge amount of crap for which the BBC uses our money.
How many of us would choose to pay for BBC3, etc.
Or creating content in that made-up language, Pidgin.
https://www.bbc.com/pidgin
Perhaps the Govt should fund these out of taxes and tax everybody £6 per month more and then have the BBC TV stations as an optional subscription service just like Netflix and Sky?
To be fair i don'tmind the world service and radio stations. I suppose the 55% for the TV so around £7 per month(?) which is a compulsory subscription people don't have a choice over.
Perhaps the Govt should fund these out of taxes and tax everybody £6 per month more and then have the BBC TV stations as an optional subscription service just like Netflix and Sky?
Because it is the law as it stands, draconian or not.You know full well that most people's issue is not being able to watch non-bbc live content when TV licence money only goes to the BBC. Not sure why anyone would defend such a draconian law.
Because that’s the law as it stands. Don’t like it? Petition your MP to have it changed.Why should we need a license to watch non-BBC content in 2020?
If the other channels got a cut of the licence for their live content then fair enough.
Do dey eat de poo poo?