TV Licence Super Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ken
  • Start date Start date
You can cancel sky but not the BBC
You can as long as you don't watch live TV (from any source) or use BBC iPlayer. That's an inconvenience many don't want but you do not need a TV licence to just own and watch a TV, it's what you watch rather than just that you do watch TV.
 

Because they post their services through your TV without your consent and then charge you for it, the only way to stop it is to give up your own time to have an argument with them

At the very least the licencing thing should be a civil matter only with no possibility of criminal sanction.
 
Last edited:
Because they post their services through your TV without your consent and then charge you for it, the only way to stop it is to give up your own time to have an argument with them

At the very least the licencing thing should be a civil matter only with no possibility of criminal sanction.
I could be wrong but no one has been criminally prosecuted for not having a TV licence. A fine is issued and it's failure to pay the fine that lands people in trouble.
 
It is NOT a BBC licence fee, it is a TV licencing fee. It is a central Govt tax, nothing else. As usual the Tories are scrabbling aroung trying to divert attention from their abysmal performance and bad headlines. The attack on the BBC is a Tory favourite despite stuffing the BBC with their placemen. The fee has come after two years of no rises. Has your SKY/Disney/etc kad no price rises in that time?

It is ridiculous.

It is not an unreasonable increase, and I assume that this is what the BBC have asked for? The government seems to be trying to make itself look like knights in shining armour and will step in to block the BBC, when they have ALWAYS set the actual increase. It was the same for the free licences. The government used to fund the free licences, then sneakily handed that responsibility to the BBC and had the nerve to criticise the BBC when they wanted to abolish them. It's typical BS from politicians. I really do believe the BBC would do a lot better when it's cut free from the government. Roll on 2027.
 
Last edited:
Rather than you having to prove to the BBC that you're not using their services the BBC's services should be inaccessible unless you pay for it, like everyone else.
Absolutely.

I don’t watch live tv and can’t remember the last time I ever used iPlayer.

But I still pay the licence fee as I don’t have the time or energy to deal with proving that I don’t use those services.

As you say it should just be a fee to access their services like every other subscription service.
 
Last edited:
But I still pay the licence fee as I don’t have the time or energy to deal with proving that I don’t use those services.

The time you spent on renewing your licence is around if not less than the time spent filling in the online form to say you don't watch live tv or require a tv licence.

 
Last edited:
They don't want that because they know it would have to be worth the fee and compete with Amazon, Netflix etc and with their current programming they just can't. The bullying is their business model. It's the only legal extortion racket.

Comedy was their big thing years ago. But BBC comedy died when they went woke. But it backfired and it's the BBC which is being cancelled :D
 
Last edited:
Yup, the BBC by then will have finally nailed its own coffin shut.

People here saying that you need to prove that you don’t consume BBC content, well, you don’t, not at all.
If (unlikely) a goon knocks on your door, either tell them to go away or just don’t answer the door.

Unless you are a vulnerable person of some I kind don't think they even bother visiting. Most sane people who own home will just bounce them off the property, so it's a waste of resources.
 
Last edited:
was just about to post the same, you have to prove nothing to the bbc jackboots. it up to them to prove your watching the BBC, put their letter in the bin unopened, and if a guy shows up at your door. tell him nothing and shut the door (unless there a police officer beside him), you have nothing to fear as long as your truly following the rules and not watching live tv
 
Criminalisation until proven innocent is the only way the current model works which is why it exists like that, if they beam something in to your home whether you want it or not and then require you pay for that service unless you can prove you're not actually using it is a mafia way of conducting business.

Because they post their services through your TV without your consent and then charge you for it, the only way to stop it is to give up your own time to have an argument with them

At the very least the licencing thing should be a civil matter only with no possibility of criminal sanction.

They may "beam the services in" but you don't have to receive them i.e. don't have an aerial. This wont stop you using other streaming services such as Netflix.

AFAIK, there are no services available that require a TV Aerial without having to pay a TV Licence.


Edit - Also, you don't really need to prove anything if/when they come around.
 
Last edited:
They don't want that because they know it would have to be worth the fee and compete with Amazon, Netflix etc and with their current programming they just can't. The bullying is their business model. It's the only legal extortion racket.

Comedy was their big thing years ago. But BBC comedy died when they went woke. But it backfired and it's the BBC which is being cancelled :D
BBC would 100pc die if it went subscription like Netflix.

I still think it'll end up as some tax.
I'll have to pay 200 a year for something I don't use, I don't want, and isn't essential.

I can't see any government letting it die.

Even keeping the current structure is a slow death.


For me..
Keep it as is.
Or send it to the Netflix model

Please don't force me to pay for it via council tax. Because I know it'll end up costing 200ppy and never ever have to be accountable for quality programs as there will be literally no way to escape paying
 
Last edited:
BBC would 100pc die if it went subscription like Netflix.

I still think it'll end up as some tax.
I'll have to pay 200 a year for something I don't use, I don't want, and isn't essential.

I can't see any government letting it die.

Even keeping the current structure is a slow death.


For me..
Keep it as is.
Or send it to the Netflix model

Please don't force me to pay for it via council tax. Because I know it'll end up costing 200ppy and never ever have to be accountable for quality programs as there will be literally no way to escape paying

They did that in Germany but I think people found loopholes to avoid paying. They still need consent to take the money and many people just didn't give it.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely.

I don’t watch live tv and can’t remember the last time I ever used iPlayer.

But I still pay the licence fee as I don’t have the time or energy to deal with proving that I don’t use those services.

As you say it should just be a fee to access their services like every other subscription service.
This is ridiculous.
If you don't use it, just don't pay it.

You're saying cancelling your DD isn't worth 150 a year?

Added... It takea me 1 minute max to cancel a DD
 
Last edited:
Absolutely.

I don’t watch live tv and can’t remember the last time I ever used iPlayer.

But I still pay the licence fee as I don’t have the time or energy to deal with proving that I don’t use those services.

As you say it should just be a fee to access their services like every other subscription service.
You don't even need to tell them. You can just stop buying a licence if you don't need one. They will send you a few bullying letters but just bin them if you can't or don't want to fill in the online form.
 
Absolutely.

I don’t watch live tv and can’t remember the last time I ever used iPlayer.

But I still pay the licence fee as I don’t have the time or energy to deal with proving that I don’t use those services.

As you say it should just be a fee to access their services like every other subscription service.
You don't have to prove anything you just don't pay.
 
I could be wrong but no one has been criminally prosecuted for not having a TV licence. A fine is issued and it's failure to pay the fine that lands people in trouble.

You're not wrong but it amounts to the same thing, failing to give them your time when they target you lands you at the magistrates courts, from then on it becomes a criminal matter with the magistrates.

If you don't pay for Netflix you don't get Netflix, at no point to you end up infront of the magistrates.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom