TV Licence Super Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ken
  • Start date Start date
SpellowHouse said:
Couldn't agree more.

I think the only reason the politicians don't do anything, is because they generally won't touch anything divisive. They would rather endlessly kick the can down the road. How many years I have heard them say "it needs to change" and yet they sit there doing nothing. They are almost as useless as the BBC itself.
Click to expand...
It’ll probably be an expensive thing to do. Is there even a way for authentication to be implemented over the broadcast network? Or would be need to replace that network with something else?
 
mrochester said:
It’ll probably be an expensive thing to do. Is there even a way for authentication to be implemented over the broadcast network? Or would be need to replace that network with something else?
Click to expand...

The BBC can do what they do in America - have adverts. I mean it's slightly sick to me that there are free BBC channels in the USA but not in the UK. They know how to do this, they are doing it already. They just need to do it here.
 
SpellowHouse said:
The BBC can do what they do in America - have adverts. I mean it's slightly sick to me that there are free BBC channels in the USA but not in the UK. They know how to do this, they are doing it already. They just need to do it here.
Click to expand...
Is it desirable for the BBC to be funded by adverts? Is there a national consensus as to how we want to fund the BBC?
 
Felon said:
One thing that annoys me, is the weaponisation of the TV licence, the way they send these goons from Capita around to people's houses, get court orders and send police to enforce them - over what? the ******* TV?. It just doesn't matter, the TV is not an important issue - why all the muscle to bash people over the head, over something that is not a serious issue.

Then I go in the other thread about dangerous dogs, where a guy has been bitten by a banned breed, has a picture of his belly which is bruised black with 3x nasty puncture wounds, pictures of the dog and information on it's owner - and he's been pleading with the police to actually take action, not 'hurry up' or 'get a progress report', but actually pleading with them to investigate the matter.

Even if I'm conflating two things, it still winds me up - because there's always resource to enforce nonsense BS like TV licenses and other crap, but serious issues (dangerous assaults) which require the same resource (police and courts) are just ignored completely, it's all backwards and stupid.
Click to expand...
Fully agree and I would like to add the needlessly clogging up the court system. Last time I looked which was a long time ago, it was over 10% of cases. A massive amount of court time is wasted on this. Which could be better spent on more serious matters.
 
plasmahal said:
If you don't need a license, all you have to do is say no thank you and close the door on them when they try and sell you a license.
Click to expand...

The whole thing is crass, though.

The way they make you legally declare you don't use something, whilst threatening prosecution - over something as unimportant as the ******* TV, and the muscle they bring to bear over it - it's totally disproportional and not in line with modern societal norms.
 
While we're moaning about the BBC :) why are they so obsessed with the murder of the health care exec in the US? Yes of course it's terrible news but I'm not sure why the BBC seem so focused on a death in anoter country.

EDIT: Nope I'm not watching the news.
 
Last edited:
steve5424 said:
It's the news. It doesn't need to be HD. It's purely for information and not how sharp and clear you can see it. It is still available on Freeview.
Click to expand...
We will have to agree to disagree.
IMO anything SD is unwatchable.
News has the special requirement of displaying text on screen, so if anything I'd argue the clarity is even more important.
 
Hotwired said:
Mostly because TVL prosecutes and almost automatically wins against tens of thousands of people a year for the simple reason that they ignore a charge notice, maybe they chuck it in the bin or use it as a firelighter. 21 days later a magistrate can rule on it using only what the TVL says. It could be so weak the TVL drops it if you show up but if you don't they get a free win.
Click to expand...

Yes but surely no one here is advising to ignore a charge notice? That would be madness as it needs to have your precise name on it.
The only thing I think people here are referring to is the standard generic letters that are sent out on mass. A charge notice will have your court date etc on it to give you an opportunity to put your side before the court so no one here in their right mind would advocate ignoring that!?

A very good friend of mine had a visit from the TV license folk early this year. He invited them in and all they did was go over to his smart 55" TV and using the remote check for live TV channels. When non came up they thanked him and left and that was it. He has heard nothing from them since.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom