Nope.
Before these changes it was just BBC channels.
Oh dear. Almost 2017 and people still believe that the BBC have detector vans.
I wonder what would happen if a child accessed bbc iplyaer using their mobile phone without parents knowledge? If the parents didn't have a license?
I wonder what would happen if a child accessed bbc iplyaer using their mobile phone without parents knowledge? If the parents didn't have a license?
It is possible to be on the iPlayer site without streaming any content.
You know what annoys me. Having to pay virgin for my TV, then having to pay BBC again for it.
I'd much prefer to lose BBC channels and not have access to these channels and not have to pay license fee. I hardly watch TV as it is, and I pay loads for the limited use I do use it.
It is possible to be on the iPlayer site without streaming any content.
The TV license is a tax, a form of nationalised industry subsidy but they wont scrap it because of the news element side to it. BBC is respected around the world, it ties into commonwealth links and trade benefits.
Its got wider political support, if it was just eastenders it would be gone already. I really think they dont want to scrap it when some of the old behind the iron curtain countries have some modicum of respect what is broadcast and there is influence and some power in its continued existence.
Its not supposed to be biased but its definitely British, you only have to look at the mess of USA reporting and news and comedy is their news , bias is massive in most countries news
If you use it, pay for it. What's hard to understand?
And what the heck does this mean? I'm not Googling it at workIANAL