They don't they know exactly what they are or would you believe that the muslim members of ocuk get up to this sort of noncence?
It's just individual perverts, gangsters and money hogs same as all the gangs that vdo this sort of crime.
Two schoolgirls abused by 60 men in Aylesbury child sex ring, court hears
- Thread starter Ilikeitblackplease
- Start date
They don't they know exactly what they are or would you believe that the muslim members of ocuk get up to this sort of noncence?
It's just individual perverts, gangsters and money hogs same as all the gangs that vdo this sort of crime.
Permabanned
Where are these muslims that are out raged at the grooming gangs? Instead of being out raged they will just say that people that are out raged are only out raged because they are foreigners. That doesn't sound like out rage to me.
I am sure on an individual level many muslims will say its wrong if pressed on the issue in a public forum. The point though is that within muslim culture (internationally) it is permitted and normalized to have sexual relations with underage girls. Do you accept that? I would argue the only reason muslims in the UK don't marry under age girls is because the british culture and law does not permit it. Sure there may be some british brought up muslims who have british values and would not support that, those muslims would be told that they are not true muslims by the ones that don't put british values before muslim ideals.
I've never felt compelled to castigate christian criminals when I read about strangers doing strange things in strange places who are white, just because someones dad is a muslim and gives him a muslim name doesn't make him a muslim, in fact I bet engaging in these crimes automatically stops you being a muslim if you ever were one.
Last edited:
Permabanned
Hang on there were Hindus, Christian and Sikhs who were part of the grooming gang, why don't you just drop your Muslim xenophobic comments and see that this is a wider cultural issue which stems from the Indian sub-continent.
You can have this for free
Caporegime
Hang on there were Hindus, Christian and Sikhs who were part of the grooming gang, why don't you just drop your Muslim xenophobic comments and see that this is a wider cultural issue which stems from the Indian sub-continent.
You can have this for free
Where does it say there were Christians in the grooming gang?
cause its lets you sit on a high horse and **** on people while calling them idiots and horrible human beings?
it's about the only sense of accomplishment some people get.
Caporegime
Nah, it's because I know loads of muslims who are really nice civic minded individuals, way better people than many of my white friends and acquaintances or ocuk bigots and far less likely to be involved in crime than the many white and black crims I know, it's elementary.
Permabanned
Hang on there were Hindus, Christian and Sikhs who were part of the grooming gang, why don't you just drop your Muslim xenophobic comments and see that this is a wider cultural issue which stems from the Indian sub-continent.
You can have this for free
As far as I am aware it was predominantly Muslims behind the grooming gangs,is that correct or not?
It seems to also affect Africa and middle east and not just India.
Permabanned
Of course there many Muslims that are nice people. They have nothing to do with this as far as I am aware. If culturally christians were still sacrificing their children to god for example. Would it matter if there was some christians who did not agree to that?
Permabanned
Stupid windows phone duplicate sorry
I know you said it twice but I still don't know what you're trying to say
I was just retorting to the fellow who said we only defend muslims so we would appear to be on high horses to the foolish bigots whereas I do it because it's correct to do so and absolutely wrong to be a bigot.
Last edited:
Permabanned
What is wrong is muslim culture where having child brides is acceptable. Pointing that out doesn't make anyone a bigot.
Associate
Well when the main figurehead of your religion consummates his marriage with his child bride at 10yr is probably a open sign for you to do what ever you want with young girls.
"From the 20th century onwards, a common point of contention has been Muhammad's marriage to Aisha, who was six or seven when betrothed to Muhammad and nine, or according to al-Tabari, ten, when the marriage was consummated."
"From the 20th century onwards, a common point of contention has been Muhammad's marriage to Aisha, who was six or seven when betrothed to Muhammad and nine, or according to al-Tabari, ten, when the marriage was consummated."
Caporegime
They'll try using the "it was a different time back then" argument against you for that. It's hilarious.
It was a different time - doesn't make it right though does it?! Surely God should know if something's bad and since prophets dictate Gods will...
They don't do that in the UK which is where my concerns end, if abusers act in a manner which is illegal they should be punished being a muslim doesn't come into it.
God raped Mary while she slept, roofy if you ask me, when she was under 12!
I say under 12 as that is when jewish girls of that era were married and virginity ended that night.
Lets face it everybody was a paedo back then various ancestors of our queen, William Wallace too, for all I know Robin Hood could have been a paedo.
Last edited:
No, that doesn't make one a bigot. The problem is blaming the abuse on the religion and blaming Muslims just because they are Muslim. Frankly, only idiots ignore other factors and think it's to do with religion.
In any case, these threads just show how 'informed' people really are.
Caporegime
Equally only idiots rule out religion as being a possible cause.
Not correct.