On Blatter, the last tourney had no extra goal line ref's, this tourney has them, the next will have goal line tech. ULtimately that is progression. The real thing that Ukraine can be angry about it, the England goal was from a greater difference and MUCH faster, harder hit, faster moving ball and no one standing directly on the line. This one was moving slower, was easier to see the chance was coming and there was some ***** standing on the line watching and missing the blatantly obvious.
Blatter will get asked about things and answer them, this question would have been given to him no matter who a goal line incident occurred against, anyone who thinks its got anything to do with England is daft.
England, they've looked no more or less organised than previous teams. People seem to ignore that Capello wasn't fired for poor performance, the team was doing well with Wilshire/Parker/Lampard, infact its a better team playing better football than we have now and excellent defensively. Compared to the last tournament we have an actual defensive midfielder, last tournament we had Barry but even so we haven't played anyone remotely good.
Anyone who didn't think we were odd's on to qualify for the knock out stages simply knows squat about football. Its easy to look fairly organised against poor teams. I also find it hard to call the team organised with so so many shots on target conceded against France and Ukraine when neither team is playing particularly well AND we spent so long defending. But for Parker having magnets snuck into all the balls and his shin pads we could have conceded many goals the way we've played.
We've done okay, we haven't played well, we haven't played any top teams, there aren't many top teams in the Euro's.