We also directly lost possession as a consequence of having nobody wanting to play forwards, nobody wanting to receive the ball under pressure, constantly going backwards and then - thanks to the Italy press - just hoofing it upfield because nobody else wanted it.My Nan could organise a defence if she was given 8/11 players who’s main duty is defence. 3 at the back, 2 wing backs, 2 DMs and the GK. Not massively impressive and offered almost nothing in attack.
Some people say Italy just had too much possession for us to play - well our use of players, tactics, instructions from the boss, they all directly enabled Italy to have more possession.
He packed the team with defensive-minded players whose main job is to break up the opposition attacks, so it's kind of not really surprising that we spent most of our time trying to break up Italy attacks
With more forward-thinking players, and players who like to receive the ball under pressure and go forwards (hey Grealish, we barely knew you), would Italy have had so much possession?
Well we don't get to know because we never tried.