You forgot the latest one, logs.Did those numbers include goats and frozen fish?
I'm asking this question to everyone on here for your thoughts.
If putin uses a tactical nuke in ukraine
Do you think NATO will respond with force? Or just leave things as they are as they aren't part of nato?
How does that work in practice though? What happen if you get called up but have spent the last 6 years behind a desk for 10 hours a day & gained 7 stone and a dodgy knee?
Then russia responds to that how?Cruise missiles to destroy the source of the nuke and associated infrastructure plus increased sanctions would be most likely.
I haven't been called up this way, so don't have personel experience, but have a friend who was.How does that work in practice though? What happen if you get called up but have spent the last 6 years behind a desk for 10 hours a day & gained 7 stone and a dodgy knee?
Then russia responds to that how?
I'm asking this question to everyone on here for your thoughts.
If putin uses a tactical nuke in ukraine
Do you think NATO will respond with force? Or just leave things as they are as they aren't part of nato?
If they do we have WW3 and this is not a good thing but if they dont Putin will not stop its catch22.I'm asking this question to everyone on here for your thoughts.
If putin uses a tactical nuke in ukraine
Do you think NATO will respond with force? Or just leave things as they are as they aren't part of nato?
Former head of the CIA and US Army General, David Petraeus gave an interview on CNN explaining that in that event, NATO would respond conventionally using massive airstrikes to destroy all Russian military infrastructure across Ukraine, including Crimea and in the Black Sea. Basically, the ability of Russian to fight a war in Ukraine would be decimated. I suspect he knows what he's talking about and I suspect this has been clearly and quietly explained to the Russians.
What happens after that is anybodys guess.
“If the russian federation ..” so basically places the blame for failure on russia (not naming putin).Not a chance, they've already lost but their crackpot dictator won't admit it.
Instead we'll have to watch thousands of innocent people die before someone finishes him off (the only way I can see it ending)
Not necessarily, they just lose their ability to wage war in Ukraine in any meaningful way. Russia itself won’t be threatened, at least not directly, so launching nukes, the only weapon they have against nato, will only guarantee the destruction of their own country.If they do we have WW3 and this is not a good thing but if they dont Putin will not stop its catch22.
In one of my previous jobs we were very strict about country of origins for steel. Basically it was Spain or UK.
We tried a little experiment with some Chinese forgings once. They all failed to meet every single required standard and upon investigation we actually found partially unmelted bolts within.
I suspect there would a be direct military response through air strikes; sinking the remainder of the black sea fleet, destroy any known tactical bombers within range of Ukraine, take out Russian air defense systems across Ukraine and probably obliterate any Russian forces near or around the area that was attacked. NATO may even just go full hog and take control of the air and support Ukrainian ground forces until Russia was driven out completely.I'm asking this question to everyone on here for your thoughts.
If putin uses a tactical nuke in ukraine
Do you think NATO will respond with force? Or just leave things as they are as they aren't part of nato?
I'm asking this question to everyone on here for your thoughts.
If putin uses a tactical nuke in ukraine
Do you think NATO will respond with force? Or just leave things as they are as they aren't part of nato?
Yeah i forgot about chemical wepons he may try this first like novichok.Rather than focussing on nukes, what if they use chemical weapons?
His friends in Syria had no qualms about that.