Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
If only Hungary had gas from Russia

oh wait


That was all the way back in August 2022. Russian gas supply still wasn't enough to save Hungarians from freezing to death, nor did it prevent heating caps or the closure of public buildings.
 
One user stops posting nonsense and another starts. It looks like they are related mentally or smth. Well at least something fishy is going on. Can mods check if they use same IP address?
 
The hotels of Budapest aren't being paid millions to accommodate an endless stream of illegal migrants entrering Hungary, and the citizens aren't sat dressed for the Arctic looking wide eyed and terrified at their gas and electricity meters....
Well, you did vote for it, over and over again...
 
Last edited:
They may have decided those would specifically be perfect for distance launching against these static defense Russia are putting up for their WW1 reenactment
Pound them with a load of precision strikes and you can create a decent gap in the defense they can rush some mine clearing and rapid forces through to create a bridgehead

As we saw with WW2 normandy landings once a defence like that is breached and the breach held its basically useless.

Just for clarity (and management of expectations) - The GBU-39, which makes up the explosive portion of the GLSBD, has just 200lbs of explosive mass so, whilst it's double the amount in a typical HIMARS/M270 M31 variant rocket, it's very, very small for an aircraft dropped bomb (1/2 the size of the smallest current US/UK dropped bombs) so these won't be used to pound open front line defences as the warhead is just too small to have any decent effect on mass trenches etc when the amount that can be fired is tiny. Thats the artilleries job, to pound thousands of shells into fortifications day after day i.e just four 155mm Artillery rounds, of which there are literally millions, has the same explosive impact as a single GLSBD of which there are a tiny number.

Instead, just like HIMARS/M270, I think it'll be used for strikes on HQ's, supplies, ammo dumps, vehicle parks etc, but I think their success will heavily depend on how well Russia has adapted post-HIMAR/M270 introduction, as we saw good effects from these weapons when they were new and unknown but now we see very little as Russia "seems" to be getting a grip of its military, Darwinism in a war does accelerate that learning process very quickly.
 
The hotels of Budapest aren't being paid millions to accommodate an endless stream of illegal migrants entrering Hungary, and the citizens aren't sat dressed for the Arctic looking wide eyed and terrified at their gas and electricity meters....
So much wrong in one post, impressive.
 
Kremlin:
- U.S. Has Destroyed Legal Basis for New START Treaty
- On New START Arms Control Treaty: As Bad As the Present Situation Is, We Believe This Treaty Is Very Important
- Asked About Bounties for Russian Soldiers Who Destroy Western-Made Tanks: Our Soldiers Will Burn These Tanks, All the More so With This Encouragement
- Asked About Possible U.S. Supplies of Long-Range Missiles to Ukraine: This Will Escalate Tensions but Will Not Stop US Achieving Our Goals

*Belarusian Servicemen Begin Full Independent Operation of Iskander Missile System - Belarus Defence Ministry
*Putin: Shelling on Russian Regions From Ukraine Should Not Be Allowed, That’s the Defence Ministry’s Task - RIA

*Austrian President Alexander van Der Bellen Says He Has Arrived in Kyiv, Will Meet Ukraine’s President
*Turkey’s Erdogan: Turkey Looks Positively on Finland’s NATO Membership but Not on Sweden’s

*Ukrainian Presidential Adviser: Talks Are Under Way With Foreign Partners on Supply of Longer-Range Missiles and Attack Aircraft
*German Defence Minister Pistorius: Even if We Were to Reintroduce Conscription, It Would Not Help US Over the Next Two to Three Years
*German Defence Minister: We Need to Quickly Order New Leopard Tanks to Replace Those Going to Ukraine
*UK Defence Secretary Wallace: No “Solid Decision” Not to Send Fighter Jets to Ukraine, but for Now Don’t Think It Is the Right Approach
*Head of Ukraine’s Ruling Party: Confirms Searches at Homes of Koloimoiskiy and Avakov
*Head of Ukraine’s Ruling Party: Searches Also Under Way at Ukraine’s Tax Office, Customs Officials to Be Dismissed
*Head of Ukraine’s Ruling Party: Ukraine ‘Will Change During the War’ and ‘if Someone Is Not Ready to Change, the State Will Come... and Help Them Change’
 
Last edited:
Just for clarity (and management of expectations) - The GBU-39, which makes up the explosive portion of the GLSBD, has just 200lbs of explosive mass so, whilst it's double the amount in a typical HIMARS/M270 M31 variant rocket, it's very, very small for an aircraft dropped bomb (1/2 the size of the smallest current US/UK dropped bombs) so these won't be used to pound open front line defences as the warhead is just too small to have any decent effect on mass trenches etc when the amount that can be fired is tiny. Thats the artilleries job, to pound thousands of shells into fortifications day after day i.e just four 155mm Artillery rounds, of which there are literally millions, has the same explosive impact as a single GLSBD of which there are a tiny number.

Instead, just like HIMARS/M270, I think it'll be used for strikes on HQ's, supplies, ammo dumps, vehicle parks etc, but I think their success will heavily depend on how well Russia has adapted post-HIMAR/M270 introduction, as we saw good effects from these weapons when they were new and unknown but now we see very little as Russia "seems" to be getting a grip of its military, Darwinism in a war does accelerate that learning process very quickly.

Thats 200lb of explosives.
 
@Harlequin - I'm a member of the "demolitia" and remember this video well :D

As a general reminder though, whilst technically that is "200lbs of explosive", in reality thats a civilian binary-explosive called Tannerite which is far less "powerful" (less shockwave velocity) vs the far more "explodey" military use RDX or Tritonal-based High Explosive which is likely to be used in the GLSDB (as used in other US MK80 series bombs). So even though a 200lb "military" explosion would be bigger than the one in that video, its still relatively small in comparison, so much so that the Ukrainians almost certainly wouldn't use whatever number of whatever their very limited stock might eventually be (none even delivered yet) digging out miles of front line trenches/fortifications etc to create a breach when, as mentioned, artillery is just a far, far better/cheaper option for that job.

For reference, that crater Matt is standing in at 4:13 in the video, which was caused by 200lbs of Tannerite, is about the same size as the crater caused by just a single 155mm military HE round which has 1/4 of the explosive of a GLSDB (155mm crater is approx 1.2-1.5m deep by 4m wide) - thats the difference in scale between a civilian binary-explosive like tannerite and military explosive.
 
Ukrainian Deputy Defence Minister:
- Fierce Fighting Continues in East of Country, Russians Are Making Powerful Attempts to Break Through Defences Near Town of Lyman
- Despite Heavy Losses, Russians Are Continuing Their Offensive Around Bakhmut and Avdiivka; Says Russians Have Superiority in Number of Weapons and Troops
 
Why is Russia shelling itself?

Everyone can see the shells are coming from territory Russia claims is Russian, therefore Russia is shelling itself
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom