Try "at all". If anything you've flipped the flag around 180 degrees and it's flying Russian colours.
For someone who claims they aren't on Russia's side on this, you seem to be putting a lot of effort into coming here and supporting a lot of their viewpoints with what you say.
Go esay on him, he had to buy fresh rubber sheets this week.
It isn't a lack of support for Ukraine, but a fundamental wish to avoid the kind of devastation that would be close to an extinction level event. Sorry if I'm not waving my Ukrainian flag vociferously enough, but pragmatism forces me to be more concerned about that than who governs some **** hole in Eastern Europe you couldn't pay me to visit in the best of times.
Ironic for a guy that probably wears a hazmat suit to go buy milk incase you get the equivalent of the common cold.
incase you get the equivalent of the common cold.
We won't have a world/global community worth living in if everyone stands idly by whilst their allies get invaded by a hostile country.
You use the word "pragmatism", when what you actually mean is surrender or cowardice.
Tends to pop up every few days and post something 'edgy' and then there are normally 10 or so replies of folk trying to argue or rationalise.Roar87 absolutely L + ratio'ing himself in this thread.
How about to avoid a larger scale war. As unpalatable as it is, the situation we have at the moment keeps it localised with limited involvement and relatively low cost whilst heavily degrading both militarily and financially one of the main threat actors in the world. Sadly it is at the cost of Ukrainian lives. The aim is de-escalation not escalation. You cant do that with Putin by sitting around a table. That he has demonstrated clearly time and time again. Therefore power and violence is the only way forward. A localised conflict is much better than a World War.Okay then, so why only the current level of support, if we aren't worried about nukes then why don't we simply kick Russia out of Ukraine by force? The US Airforce would make pretty short work of that.
Cus Red Pill Bro...Tends to pop up every few days and post something 'edgy' and then there are normally 10 or so replies of folk trying to argue or rationalise.
What this has sadly demonstrated (regarding nukes) , is those countries the west doesnt want to have them / get them , the countries wont give them up ever - North Korea, Saudi Arabia and Iran as 3 examples
How about to avoid a larger scale war. As unpalatable as it is, the situation we have at the moment keeps it localised with limited involvement and relatively low cost whilst heavily degrading both militarily and financially one of the main threat actors in the world. Sadly it is at the cost of Ukrainian lives. The aim is de-escalation not escalation. You cant do that with Putin by sitting around a table. That he has demonstrated clearly time and time again. Therefore power and violence is the only way forward. A localised conflict is much better than a World War.
Okay then, so why only the current level of support, if we aren't worried about nukes then why don't we simply kick Russia out of Ukraine by force? The US Airforce would make pretty short work of that.
Ofc, tin foil hat moment - was China testing covid as a weaponWhat it has demonstrated is that nuclear weapons are a massive barrier to conventional war and unlikely to result in nuclear war unless a mad man has the ability to use them who doesn't care for their own survival - fortunately those more rogue states are ruled by people who do care about their survival (even if they are nutters).
NATO and/or the US going into Ukraine mob handed is a huge gamble, far too big a gamble to roll the dice on nuclear war, though in reality unlikely for Russia to resort to nukes - where nuclear outcomes become a huge risk is when there is a direct threat to Putin himself.
Ofc, tin foil hat moment - was China testing covid as a weapon. USSR had a huge bioweapons programme, and were getting close to RNA splicing virus in the 1990`s
Ofc, tin foil hat moment - was China testing covid as a weapon. USSR had a huge bioweapons programme, and were getting close to RNA splicing virus in the 1990`s
Because the evidence suggests otherwise. Things arnt escalating, frustratingly its a status quo at the moment, relatively stagnant conflict. It is a fine balance, hopefully this changes in the coming months. However all we are doing for the most part is facilitating Ukraine to protect and fight for itself and hopefully to reinstate its internationally recognised borders.Yet when I suggest we've already moved the needle too far I'm ridiculed.
Okay then, so why only the current level of support, if we aren't worried about nukes then why don't we simply kick Russia out of Ukraine by force? The US Airforce would make pretty short work of that.