Soldato
So why can’t we get the trash made domestically too?
We could but the cheap labour element would still make ours more expensive
Its why the likes of Dyson had such a hard on for Brexit on the assumption we would dilute worker rights
So why can’t we get the trash made domestically too?
One US government member (sorry I forget who) actually stated in response of Republican condemnation of the money going to Ukraine, that in 22-23 the US spent 5.6% of its defence budget to destroy nearly half of Russia's conventional military capability.In a very cold way of looking at it, in many ways the war in Ukraine is one of the cheapest ways for the USA to grind down one of its major international rivals.
A lot of older Americans (and younger ones taken in by talk from the older ones or some TV commentators) view this as an internal Soviet conflict, they don't see why we should be paying to help the less Russian Rooskies fight the more Russian Rooskies >.>I'm pretty surprised that 34% view Ukraine unfavourably. Just why?
We could but the cheap labour element would still make ours more expensive
Its why the likes of Dyson had such a hard on for Brexit on the assumption we would dilute worker rights
So why can’t we get the trash made domestically too?
Well basically because if you're making trash grade products out of trash grade materials you only need to employ trash grade machinists to do it, and locally they would still require minimum wage.So why does cheap labour make the trash worth making in china but not the good stuff?
So why does cheap labour make the trash worth making in china but not the good stuff?
Well basically because if you're making trash grade products out of trash grade materials you only need to employ trash grade machinists to do it, and locally they would still require minimum wage.
But if you want quality you need skilled machinists and you have to pay them for their skills.
it wouldnt be the first time UN peacekeepers have been fired onWonder what would happen if Ukraine asked the UN, or even their NATO allies, to provide personnel to help with humanitarian aid in the areas affected by the rising water levels? Would Russia dare to fire on them?
Life is great, the problem is the other people. I don't even trust my own opinions.Ta for all the answers.
I'd expect 10%, maybe a little more.
A third is a whole lot of cretins. I'm genuinely surprised* at that.
* "surprised" in civil service language which means "horrified"
Then you also have the "Why do we even have to be involved, let Europe fix their own mess" crowds.
I was looking at the latest imagary of the dam earlier today. More I looked at it more I'm convinced this was a deliberate setting off of placed demolitions. As opposed to negligence/incompetence. I can understand the center gated section of the damn failing due to increased water/previous damage. However there is 3 clear breach points, with the most southern of the two breaches covering the Hydro generation buildings looking the most obvious/suspect.New imgary shows the dam is damaged in 3 places.
I'm pretty surprised that 34% view Ukraine unfavourably. Just why?
Riddled with and/or surrounded by. It was, and is, an idealogical choice. When your home is being occupied I am sure the focus comes quickly.The west of Ukraine was full of collaborators in WW2, but it goes against the copiam/we support the latest thing trend to discuss any negatives or the reality of history. News articles are difficult to find on search engines now but Ukraine has always been riddled with corruption and extremists on both sides, Nothing has changed.