I don't think the "first line of defence" even included dragons teeth etc.
Now I can't get shark teeth out of my head.
I don't think the "first line of defence" even included dragons teeth etc.
Now I can't get shark teeth out of my head.
Novo dorivka was recaptured and has had counter attacks to take it back (which were replled). This isnt WW1 where dragons teeth and ditches might have been sueful - WW2 proved that not to be the case where combat engineers proved their mettle.
AFU took it back 7 days agoWho recaptured novo?
Wondering if the real purpose for pulling Wagner out of Bahkmut, was so they could really be used as reserves against a counter attack wherever that happened. All the talk going back and forth, you have to wonder if it's all just propaganda from Prig.
This complicates things as far as Russia/Wagner is concerned https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...act-with-russian-defence-minister-2023-06-11/They would suit an urgent plug the gap at any cost type throw some troops to their death if it slows down an advance scenario.
However despite that suitability its a massive front line to hold, if/when breaches start to occur there is no guarantee the Ukrainians will rush to exploit that one, but the Russians will need to assume they will and rush troops to that breach.
This complicates things as far as Russia/Wagner is concerned https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...act-with-russian-defence-minister-2023-06-11/
Wondering if the real purpose for pulling Wagner out of Bahkmut, was so they could really be used as reserves against a counter attack wherever that happened. All the talk going back and forth, you have to wonder if it's all just propaganda from Prig.
They pulled out because it was an unwinnable meat grinder and still is.Wondering if the real purpose for pulling Wagner out of Bahkmut, was so they could really be used as reserves against a counter attack wherever that happened. All the talk going back and forth, you have to wonder if it's all just propaganda from Prig.
The guy reacting on twitter is misunderstanding what he's reading, the fact Chernobyl is in quotations is because it's being referenced as the event not the physical complex/location.
The fact the Chernobyl disaster took place in what is now the country of Ukraine is not the zinger he thinks it is.
If I was behind I would have slapped him so hard.
Not at all awkward