Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
Was just watching some combat vet reacts and hes reacting to a video about Ukrainians elite 47th
They are talking about the Paladin and the cluster munitions.
Interesting they confirmed what many of us had expected, 1) only used where its confirmed there are no civilians, and 2) probably more importantly, they record every single round used so they know where any unexploded cluster munitions could be.
 
Seems like there operating windows 3.1 at the moment.
Windows 3.11 For Wagnergroups.

Looks like Armenia war kicked off one for another thread though.
Technically it's a linked discussion, as this is a country like Syria that has previously been militarily supported by Russia and they would never be getting invaded right now if their protector wasn't busily drowning in it's own faces, it will be interesting to see how Russia respond. Do they divert resources from Ukraine to try and maintain their superpower image or do they take the embarrassment hit of their protectorate getting steamrolled.


Some info the Russian MOD ordered 230,000 death certificates :eek:
Always pays to buy n bulk, random fact of interest: The USA hasn't bought any purple hearts (their medal for being killed/injured in combat) since WW2, they're still using the order they placed as part of the preparation for the invasion of Japan.


While I don't know much about them I'm not convinced Taurus missiles are better than Storm Shadow/SCALP at evading air defences
On the plus side, it's an additional supply line of "thing that is better than anything similar the Russians have" for Ukraine, anything on top is a bonus.
 
2) probably more importantly, they record every single round used so they know where any unexploded cluster munitions could be.
I really hope this is more of an after-action report detail rather than something that someone is tasked with doing in the middle of a battle.

The first unit I was stationed with was an artillery unit and timeliness in both striking targets and getting the hell out of ther was imperative.
 
Last edited:
Windows 3.11 For Wagnergroups.


Technically it's a linked discussion, as this is a country like Syria that has previously been militarily supported by Russia and they would never be getting invaded right now if their protector wasn't busily drowning in it's own faces, it will be interesting to see how Russia respond. Do they divert resources from Ukraine to try and maintain their superpower image or do they take the embarrassment hit of their protectorate getting steamrolled.



Always pays to buy n bulk, random fact of interest: The USA hasn't bought any purple hearts (their medal for being killed/injured in combat) since WW2, they're still using the order they placed as part of the preparation for the invasion of Japan.



On the plus side, it's an additional supply line of "thing that is better than anything similar the Russians have" for Ukraine, anything on top is a bonus.

Timing seems strange. Plus I don’t think you’d get much discount on paper.
 
video @warmonitors @Twitter

No air defence here :eek:
It gets worse, much worse :(

Russia’s Aerospace Forces delivered a strike on the Dolgintsevo airfield near Krivoi Rog in the Dnepropetrovsk Region on September 11, wiping out two MiG-29 jets and three Su-25 aircraft of Ukraine’s air force
Losing the MiG-29s isn't great, but they do have 80 ish. Losing three Su-25s however is downright terrible news. That's almost a quarter of their stock :(

*EDIT*

Slightly better news, it seems their stock of Su-25 has actually doubled over the past few months due to donations from Bulgaria and the country north of Macedonia. so only down to 32 instead of 14 :)
 
Last edited:
The Honeywell GG1320AN Digital RLG is one of the best around but it still has a wander rate of about a mile an hour (Honeywell's own figures https://aerospace.honeywell.com/us/...-still-amazing-honeywell-ring-laser-gyroscope). No way will that hit a submarine after even 20 minutes of flight.

Let me clarify this as I can see what I originally posted is confusing regarding this -

I meant that the LRG is accurate enough to get the missile to about 10km+ away from the target which is when the IIR sensor in the nose takes over during the terminal phase, not that the LRG alone is accurate enough to hit a Sub without the IIR sensor.

I split that single sentence up into two different sentences in my original post which added to the confusion, sorry about that.
 
video @warmonitors @Twitter

No air defence here :eek:

Though actually not easy and expensive (though that takes on a different dimension in war) to construct hardened shelters do work even against Lancets, I'm surprised they've not got them let alone air defences - a single Lancet shouldn't get anywhere near those planes.

I had to chuckle at the array of tyres at the side of the apron as well in the context of what the Russians are doing LOL.
 
Last edited:
The NY Times have released a story claiming, with quite a lot of credible physical evidence TBF, that the recent Russian missile attack on the marketplace of Kostiantynivka was in fact not a Russian missile but caused by a faulty Ukrainian SAM (anti-aircraft) missile from a BUK system fired 4 minute earlier, based on recovered missile fragments amongst other things -


More info for anyone not subscribed to the NY Times is here at Business Insider -


I'm still not 100% convinced yet (about 90% convinced) as things like the "missile direction deduced from a reflection on a car roof" have already been shown to be unreliable but physical things like missile fragments from a specific type of missile are, for me at least, more of a positive ID. Irrespective however, no news is ever 100% clear in a war where propagada exists on both sides and Russia is still 100% at fault here as these innocent civilians are still dead because of the Russian's invasion at the end of the day not matter how they died.
 
Last edited:
I mean.. that is one hell of a large explosion for anti air.

Some like the S-200 are massive missiles, though BUKs are a bit smaller - the explosion looked a bit on the big side for ~70kg warhead - would have said more like the 100-150kg from an S-300 or something.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom