No no no... You are the last one who should be going on about people launching into "pedantic rants".
Dont worry though I'll keep it short. I quote,
I've removed the guff but thats not even taking things out of context. Nothing should be taken from ChatGPT as "actual fact" without proper verification and secondary sources. Try harder!
Lets be honest here though. With your track record, if you told me water was wet with verifiable proof, i'd still check for myself.
You seem to be in this thread for nothing more than just that to argue the counter point, I dont even think you believe half what you post its that stupid. You seem to get some sort of buzz from derailing threads and sending them down the toilet for a page at a time.
I'm not sure if you realise this steve, but this is an internet forum, using Chat GPT to quickly validate a simple non-subjective fact is perfectly fine. It's also correct in this case. Do you dispute that? If not then could you stop derailing the thread?