Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar

Status
Not open for further replies.
There is disagreeing with your counties stance and using your tax money to support someone else (its your right) but bloody hell this is something else all together, its like he is showing support for Russia.

He is and has supported Russia from day 1. He said live on air he wanted Russia to win.
 
See what he says when he gets back? Isn't he a journalist? Maybe he's actually going to say something interesting...

Woah, woah WOAH, - you actually want "context" before joining the flaming torch hate mob???? We don't do that in here, there's only "Pure hatred" or "Russian Shill/Bot" allowed and don't you forget it!!!! :D
 
Woah, woah WOAH, - you actually want "context" before joining the flaming torch hate mob???? We don't do that in here, there's only "Pure hatred" or "Russian Shill/Bot" allowed and don't you forget it!!!! :D
I would think any association with a country that launched a chemical attack in the middle of England ought to be treated with extreme prejudice.
 
There is disagreeing with your counties stance and using your tax money to support someone else (its your right) but bloody hell this is something else all together, its like he is showing support for Russia.
depends why he is there surely?

it's not like the countries are at war.

He could just be visiting friends or family, are you suddenly not allowed?

Wasnt there another guy Seagull idiot who actually went to live there and supports them?
 
Last edited:
I haven’t seen that. Got a link?

He said “Why shouldn’t I root for Russia? Which I am” back in 2019 before the invasion -




But he rapidly walked that back to "I was joking" which no-one really believes (I don't, I think he meant it) and post invasion he's not said anything so obvious about wanting Russia to win but instead he's been very vocal about stopping the US "sending money to Ukraine", which would obviously lead to Russia winning, hence back to people believing he was really saying "I want Russia to win without saying I do" loop. His context for the "stop sending money" issue is he wants it spent on the US instead, which he thinks gives him a riposte to those saying he wants Russia to win as he can say "No, I want the US to be better for its citizens" - Both sides would be simultaneously right and wrong to believe either version I think.

I would think any association with a country that launched a chemical attack in the middle of England ought to be treated with extreme prejudice.

Without context we don't know "why" he's there - it could be to do a hit piece on Putin, it could be to do a puff piece, it might not be anything to with journalism, it might be to assassinate Putin, who knows!

Without context we have no idea why he's there, and if we have no idea then, to me, it seems silly to attack him. However, once we know why he's there then it might be absolute right to criticise him, who knows, I'll wait until we have context before acting but thats just me I guess.
 
Thanks @ianh - yep, he comes across as an idiot in that first clip. If you wanted to be charitable you could say he was deliberately coming up with the opposite view but it’s still a daft position.
 
Woah, woah WOAH, - you actually want "context" before joining the flaming torch hate mob???? We don't do that in here, there's only "Pure hatred" or "Russian Shill/Bot" allowed and don't you forget it!!!! :D

Yes, let’s wait eagerly for some cutting journalism from a toe rag agent provocateur with history of lying for cash and also isn’t a journalist.

I’m sure old Tucker is really going to give it Putin with both barrels.
 
Last edited:
Woah, woah WOAH, - you actually want "context" before joining the flaming torch hate mob???? We don't do that in here, there's only "Pure hatred" or "Russian Shill/Bot" allowed and don't you forget it!!!! :D

We all know who Tucker Carlson is and his views, he's been discussed and brought up many times, not sure why you're creating some imaginary faux rage as though this is the first time we've heard of him and his antics.
 
Last edited:
As for the 1946 guns, it will be interesting to see just how far back they can go?
Putin must be raging in his sleep at Yeltsin for scrapping all of Russia's heavy tanks in 1996 to make room in storage.

I'm sure if Vlad had the option of unleashing thousands of IS-# and T-10 tanks at Ukraine he would do it, the muppet xD
 
It's unimaginable that one of the most complex machines on earth would ever go wrong.
they're complicated, but when the bits that keep getting the ships stuck in dock are what should be the "simple" bits like propulsion then it sort of begs the question, why doesn't this keep happening to the likes of cruise ships and commercial ships that use similar systems.

And "prop shafts" are relatively simple, it's not the gearing, it's not the engine, it's what should be the simplest part of the propulsion system assuming it's been designed correctly, the right materials have been specified and used, and it's been machined correctly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom